Ingredients of a Deep Inference Theorem Prover
نویسنده
چکیده
Deep inference deductive systems for classical logic provide exponentially shorter proofs than the sequent calculus systems, however with the cost of higher nondeterminism and larger search space in proof search. We report on our ongoing work on proof search with deep inference deductive systems. We present systems for classical logic where nondeterminism in proof search is reduced by constraining the context management rule of these systems. We argue that a deep inference system for classical logic can outperform sequent calculus deductive systems in proof search when nondeterminism and the application of the contraction rule are controlled by means of invertible rules.
منابع مشابه
A High Level Reachability Analysis using Multiway Decision Graph in the HOL Theorem Prover
In this paper, we provide all the necessary infrastructure to define a high level states exploration approach within the HOL theorem prover. While related work has tackled the same problem by representing primitive BDD operations as inference rules added to the core of the theorem prover, we have based our approach on the Multiway Decision Graphs (MDGs). We define canonic MDGs as well-formed di...
متن کاملNatural Solution to FraCaS Entailment Problems
Reasoning over several premises is not a common feature of RTE systems as it usually requires deep semantic analysis. On the other hand, FraCaS is a collection of entailment problems consisting of multiple premises and covering semantically challenging phenomena. We employ the tableau theorem prover for natural language to solve the FraCaS problems in a natural way. The expressiveness of a type...
متن کاملE - a brainiac theorem prover
We describe the superposition-based theorem prover E. E is a sound and complete prover for clausal first order logic with equality. Important properties of the prover include strong redundancy elimination criteria, the DISCOUNT loop proof procedure, a very flexible interface for specifying search control heuristics, and an efficient inference engine. We also discuss strength and weaknesses of t...
متن کاملUsing widenings to infer loop invariants inside an SMT solver, or: A theorem prover as abstract domain
This paper presents a new technique for combining the inference power of abstract interpretation with the precision and flexibility of an automatic satisfiabilitymodulo-theories theorem prover.
متن کاملDarr – a Theorem Prover for Constrained and Rational Default Logics
Default logics represent an important class of the nonmonotonic formalisms. Using simple by powerful inference rules, called defaults, these logic systems model reasoning patterns of the form ”in the absence of information to the contrary of. . . ”, and thus formalize the default reasoning, a special type of nonmonotonic reasoning. In this paper we propose an automated system, called DARR, with...
متن کامل