Vascular Inflammation in Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Type 2 Diabetes

Background—Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Vascular inflammation is a key factor in both the pathogenesis and outcome of atherosclerosis. F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising tool for indentifying and quantifying vascular inflammation within atherosclerotic plaques. This study was designed to examine the vascular inflammation measured using FDG-PET in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM, in comparison with ageand sex-matched control subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Methods and Results—We investigated vascular inflammation using FDG-PET in 90 ageand sex-matched subjects with different glucose tolerance (30 normal glucose tolerance subjects, 30 impaired glucose tolerance subjects, and 30 T2DM subjects). Vascular 18F-FDG uptake was measured as both the mean and maximum blood-normalized standardized uptake value, known as the target-to-background ratio (TBR). Both mean and maximum TBR measurements were significantly different, based on glucose tolerance, although the carotid intima-media thickness measurements were not significantly different. The maximum TBR values in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM were significantly increased compared with the normal subjects. In addition, subjects with metabolic syndrome had increased maximum TBR values compared with those without metabolic syndrome. Age-, sex-, and body mass index–adjusted maximum TBR levels were positively correlated with triglyceride, hemoglobin A1c, insulin resistance, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and Framingham risk score and were negatively correlated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adiponectin levels. Conclusions—The results of the present study suggest that impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM are associated with vascular inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis detected by FDG-PET. (Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:142-148.)