Graph Theoretical Structures in Logic Programs and Default Theories

نویسندگان

  • Yannis Dimopoulos
  • Alberto Torres
چکیده

In this paper we present a graph representation of logic programs and default theories. We show that many of the semantics proposed for logic programs can be expressed in terms of notions emerging from graph theory, establishing in this way a link between the fields. Namely the stable models, the partial stable models, and the well-founded semantics correspond respectively to the kernels, semikernels and the initial acyclic part of the associated graph. This link allows us to consider both theoretical problems (existence, uniqueness) and computational problems (tractability, algorithms, approximations) from a more abstract and rather combinatorial point of view. It also provides a clear and intuitive understanding about how conflicts between rules are resolved within the different semantics. Furthermore, we extend the basic framework developed for logic programs to the case of Default Logic by introducing the notions of partial, deterministic and well-founded extensions for default theories. These semantics capture different ways of reasoning with a default theory.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Domain Theory Meets Default Logic 1

We present a development of the theory of default information structures, combining ideas from domain theory with ideas from non-monotonic logic. Conceptually, our treatment is distinguished from standard default logic in that we view default structures as generating models rather than theories. Reiter's default rules are viewed as non-deterministic algorithms for generating preferred partial m...

متن کامل

The Alternating Semantics for Default Theories and Logic Programs

In this paper we propose a semantics for default theories, based on van Gelder's alternating xpoint theory. The distinct feature of this semantics is its preservation of Reiter's semantics when a default theory is not considered \problematic" under Reiter's semantics. Diierences arise only when a default theory has no extensions, or has only \biased extensions" under Reiter's semantics. This fe...

متن کامل

Relating Disjunctive Logic Programs to Default Theories

This paper presents the relationship between disjunctive logic programs and default theories. We rst show that Bidoit and Froidevaux's positivist default theory causes a problem in the presence of disjunctive information in a program. Then we present a correct transformation of disjunctive logic programs into default theories and show a one-to-one correspondence between the stable models of a p...

متن کامل

The Modal Logic S4F, the Default Logic, and the Logic Here-and-There

The modal logic S4F provides an account for the default logic of Reiter, and several modal nonmonotonic logics of knowledge and belief. In this paper we focus on a fragment of the logic S4F concerned with modal formulas called modal defaults, and on sets of modal defaults — modal default theories. We present characterizations of S4F-expansions of modal default theories, and show that strong and...

متن کامل

Domain Theory Meets Default

1 Abstract. We present a development of the theory of default information structures, combining ideas from domain theory with ideas from non-monotonic logic. Conceptually, our treatment is distinguished from standard default logic in that we view default structures as generating models rather than theories. Reiter's default rules are viewed as non-deterministic algorithms for generating preferr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Theor. Comput. Sci.

دوره 170  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996