The Capricious Cushion: The Implications of the Directors and Insurance Liability Crisis on Canadian Corporate Governance
نویسندگان
چکیده
One of the clearest legacies of the growing concern expressed over the international competitiveness of Canadian and American businesses has been the urgency it has lent to a very old debate respecting the efficacy of the apparatus used to govern the business and affairs of large, public corporations. For instance, Michael Porter, one of the most articulate if not the most prolific of the new competitiveness scholars, has suggested that American economic performance could be improved by enhancing the performance of the traditional corporate governance apparatus. In this respect, his suggestions closely track the thrust of recent reform initiatives proposed by investors and regulators who seek to increase the performance of the board by making it more responsive, indeed responsible, to shareholder interests. Although some of the current critics of the corporate board have placed exclusive faith in the ability of market mechanisms to ensure heightened board effectiveness, most initiatives rely to some extent on strengthened legal duties and responsibilities to achieve this task. And, as measured by the growing willingness of both courts and securities regulators to impose liability on directors for failing to review diligently various corporate transactions (i.e., self-interested transactions, public financings, etc.), it is clear that the reformist calls made by these critics are slowly but surely being heeded. Paralleling the trend to increased legal liability of boards for actions that are inimical to shareholder interests has been an equally clear trend towards enhanced legal responsibility for corporate conduct deemed contrary to broader stakeholder or community interests.
منابع مشابه
Directors ’ and Officers ’ Insurance : Ordinary Corporate Expense or Valuable Signaling Device ?
After many years in which directors have used directors’ and officers’ (D&O) coverage to shield themselves from personal responsibility for corporate failure, directors at Enron and WorldCom have been forced to pay $31 million out of their own pockets to settle securities class action lawsuits stemming from two of the largest corporate governance scandals in U.S. history. These settlements have...
متن کاملDirectors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance, Corporate Risk and Risk Taking: New Panel Data Evidence on the Role of Directors’ and Officers’ Liability
In this paper, we develop and estimate models of the determinants of firms’ demand for directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. We add to and validate the existing empirical literature by testing hypotheses regarding the relationship between D&O insurance purchase and firm size, governance characteristics and business risk. Our data set allows us to test both purchase decisions and limits ...
متن کاملThe Role of Corporate Governance in improving the Regulatory Ranking of Iranian Private Banks
The health of a bank helps to maintain the trust and confidence of the bank and also the interests of the beneficiaries. But balancing the interests of all stakeholders requires improving corporate governance in banks. Given the importance of the issue, this paper examines the effect of corporate governance on bankschr('39') regulatory rankings. For this purpose, the required criteria have been...
متن کاملThe impact of corporate governance on the financial performance of listed companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange Chemical industry
The purpose of the present paper is that of researching the impact of corporate governance on financial performance, on a sample of 3 companies (Tamin Petroleum & Petrochemical Investment Co., Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industries Company and Parsian Oil and Gas Development Group), mainly from the chemical industry area, listed at Tehran Stock Exchange index, during the period 2011-2016. In thi...
متن کاملMust Boards Go Overboard? An Economic Analysis of the Effects of Burgeoning Statutory Liability on the Role of Directors in Corporate Governance
On July 21, 1992, six outside directors on the board of Westar Mining Ltd. resigned abruptly from the company's board of directors. Westar was a troubled mining company operating in British Columbia. In 1991, the company had lost $62.2 million, mainly as the result of a poorly performing export coal mine. While resigning from the board, the directors assured the public that there had been no wr...
متن کامل