What's Special about Book Editors? A Bibliometric Comparison of Book Editors and other Flemish Researchers in the Social Sciences and Humanities
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper examines the bibliometric characteristics of book editors and non-editors, focussing on gender, career stage, number of publications and collaboration practices. The data consist of 8970 Flemish affiliated researchers with at least one publication between 2000 and 2011 in the comprehensive Flemish academic bibliometric database (VABB-SHW). The analysis shows that most book editors are established male researchers while most non-editors are non-established male researchers. Moreover, males are more likely to be editors than are females. Half of the established editors edit more than 1 book, in contrast to only a small number of non-established editors. Overall, book editors publish more than non-editors, but, when controlling for career stage, book editors publish even more book chapters and monographs than do non-editors. Although editors are highly collaborative while editing a book, no significant differences were found in the number of collaborative articles, monographs, book chapters and proceedings written by editors and non-editors. Conference Topic Country-level studies
منابع مشابه
Critique of Manuscript-Correction/ The Role of Editors in Presenting the Author: A review of Toghray Mashhadi's biography in his newly published Book of Essays, Fatima Mehri
The Role of Editors in Presenting the Author A Review of Toghray Mashhadi's Biography in His Newly Published Book of Essays Fatemeh Mehri Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University [email protected] Abstract Researchers in the field of editing and correction manuscripts consider the writing of introductions as part of the correction process. T...
متن کاملAnalyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and types of publishers in the Book Citation Index
This paper presents a first approach to analyzing the factors that determine the citation characteristics of books. For this we use the Thomson Reuters’ Book Citation Index, a novel multidisciplinary database launched in 2010 which offers bibliometric data of books. We analyze three possible factors which are considered to affect the citation impact of books: the presence of editors, the inclus...
متن کاملBook reviews in humanities research evaluations
Bibliometric evaluations of research outputs in the social sciences and humanities are challenging due to limitations associated with Web of Science data; however background literature shows that scholars are interested in stimulating improvements. We give special attention to book reviews processed by Web of Science history and literature journals, focusing on two types: Type I (i.e., referenc...
متن کاملQuality related publication categories in social sciences and humanities, based on a university's peer review assessments
Introduction Bibliometric analysis has firmly conquered its place as an instrument for evaluation and international comparison of performance levels. Consequently, differences in coverage by standard bibliometric databases installed a dichotomy between on the one hand the well covered 'exact' sciences, and on the other hand most of the social sciences and humanities with a more limited coverage...
متن کاملCoverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index
Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the disciplinary coverage of the Thomson Reuters' Book Citation Index database focusing on publisher presence, impact and specialization. Design/Methodology/approach: We conduct a descriptive study in which we examine coverage by discipline, publisher distribution by field and country of publication, and publisher impact. For this the Thomson Reuters...
متن کامل