Selective digestive decontamination is superior to selective oropharyngeal decontamination

نویسندگان

  • Luciano Silvestri
  • Nia Taylor
  • Durk F Zandstra
  • Hendrick KF van Saene
چکیده

are interested in the debate on the effi cacy and safety of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) raised by Schultz and Haas in their review [1]. Th e authors concluded that 'SDD and SOD are equally eff ective with respect to the prevention of mortality' [1]. Th is statement is based on the results of a Dutch randomized controlled trial [2], which was the fi rst to demonstrate a survival benefi t of SOD. However, the mortality reduction was higher, albeit not signifi cantly, in the SDD group than in the SOD group. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis, including nine SOD randomized controlled trials and 4,733 patients, failed to show any signifi cant mortality reduction (odds ratio (OR) = 0.93; 95% confi dence interval (CI) = 0.81 to 1.07) [3]. In contrast , there is robust evidence indicating that SDD including parenteral and enteral antimicrobials signifi cantly reduces mortality [4]. Th e authors wrote that 'whether SDD or SOD are favorable with regard to development of antibiotic resistance is yet unknown' [1]. Th e Dutch randomized controlled trial, however, showed that patients with aerobic Gram-negative bacilli in rectal swabs resistant to the marker antibiotics numbered less with SDD than with SOD [2]. Additionally, bacteremia due to highly resistant patho gens was signifi cantly reduced by SDD compared with SOD (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.85), and lower respira tory tract colonization due to highly resistant pathogens was lower with SDD (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.78) than with SOD (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.87) compared with standard care [5]. We believe that SDD is superior to SOD in terms of both mortality reduction and emergence of resistance. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. References 1. Schultz MJ, Haas LE: Antibiotics or probiotics as preventive measures against ventilator-associated pneumonia: a literature review. Crit Care oropharyngeal chlorhexidine to prevent pneumonia and to reduce mortality in ventilated patients: which manoeuvre is evidence-based? A: Survival benefi t of the full selective digestive decontamination regimen. Eff ects of selective digestive and selective oropharyngeal decontamination on bacteraemia and respiratory tract colonization with highly resistant microorganisms [abstract].

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES To determine the effect on mortality of selective digestive decontamination, selective oropharyngeal decontamination, and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine in adult patients in general intensive care units and to compare these interventions with each other in a network meta-analysis. DESIGN Systematic review, conventional meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Medline, Embase,...

متن کامل

Selective Decontamination of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Possible Strategy to Reduce Infection in High-Risk Populations

The microbial ecology in the human digestive tract is diverse and here environmental triggers, immune signals and genetic susceptibility can affect the human host’s response to infection [1]. Selective decontamination has emerged as a potential treatment for patients at high risk of infection such as those; in the critical care environments, undergoing invasive surgical operations, or with sign...

متن کامل

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia usually originates from the patient's oropharyngeal microflora. In selective digestive decontamination, topical antibiotics are applied to the oropharynx and stomach for prevention of pneumonia and other infections, possibly reducing infection-related mortality. Selective digestive decontamination is also used for the prevention of gut-derived infections in acute...

متن کامل

Should selective digestive decontamination be used in critically ill patients?

Healthcare associated infection represents a major burden for critically ill patients; a recent point prevalence survey by the Health Protection Agency observed that 23.4% of patients in intensive care units had evidence of a healthcare associated infection.Ventilator associated pneumonia remains the leading cause of nosocomial infection in this population, and, although recent estimates of att...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 15  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011