Ambiguous beliefs and mechanism design
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper develops a payoff equivalence theorem for mechanisms with ambiguity averse participants with preferences of the Maxmin Expected Utility (MEU) form (Gilboa and Schmeidler [8]). We use our payoff equivalence result to explicitly characterize the revenue maximizing private value auction mechanism for agents with arbitrary forms of ambiguous beliefs. We also show that the revenue ranking between first and second price auctions is sensitive to the form of ambiguity aversion. Our payoff equivalence techniques allow us to study the constrained efficient, budget balanced bilateral trade mechanism and show that increased ambiguity improves the efficiency of the mechanism. In addition, we characterize the revenue maximizing, efficient bilateral trade mechanism and show that heightened ambiguity lowers ex ante budget deficits.
منابع مشابه
Eliciting Ambiguous Beliefs Under α-Maxmin Preference
We study the problem of elicitation of subjective beliefs of an agent when the beliefs are ambiguous (the set of beliefs is a non-singleton set) and the agent’s preference exhibits ambiguity aversion; in particular, as represented by α-maxmin preferences. We construct a direct revelation mechanism such that truthful reporting of beliefs is the agent’s unique best response. The mechanism uses kn...
متن کاملHierarchies of ambiguous beliefs
We present a theory of interactive beliefs analogous to Mertens and Zamir [31] and Brandenburger and Dekel [10] that allows for hierarchies of ambiguity. Each agent is allowed a compact set of beliefs at each level, rather than just a single belief as in the standard model. We propose appropriate definitions of coherency and common knowledge for our types. Common knowledge of coherency closes t...
متن کاملParticipation in Risk Sharing under Ambiguity
This paper is about (non) participation in efficient risk sharing in an economy where agents have ambiguous beliefs about uncertain states of nature. Ambiguity of beliefs is described by the multiple-prior expected utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989). The question we ask is whether and how can ambiguous beliefs give rise to some agents not participating in efficient risk sharing. The ...
متن کاملSpeculative Trade under Ambiguity ∗ Jan
Ambiguous beliefs may lead to speculative trade and speculative bubbles. We demonstrate this by showing that the classical Harrison and Kreps (1978) example of speculative trade among agents with heterogeneous beliefs can be replicated with agents having common ambiguous beliefs. More precisely, we show that the same asset prices and pattern of trade can be obtained in equilibrium with agents’ ...
متن کاملKnightian games and robustness to ambiguity
This paper considers incomplete information games with ambiguous beliefs represented by compact sets of probability measures. We propose a definition of equilibrium for such games that does not rely on a max-min decision rule, but instead requires equilibrium strategies to be approximate best responses for all measures that define a player’s belief. We apply the resulting model of a game with a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 75 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012