Incentives for Pollution Abatement: Regulation, Regulatory Threats, and Non-Governmental Pressures
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the last decade, voluntary efforts by firms to reduce their environmental impacts have received increasing attention from both policymakers and scholars. In this article, we consider polluters’ incentives to reduce their releases. In particular, using data from Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory, we examine the impacts of conventional regulation, threats of regulation, and non-governmental pressures facilitated by public dissemination of information about pollutant releases. We find that the vast majority of reductions reported to the inventory to date were not voluntary, as has often been assumed, but are, rather, the result of direct regulation of a relatively small number of polluters. We find strong effects of federal regulation among other sources as well, with much weaker responses to the mere threat of regulation. However, we raise concerns about growth of less visible waste streams, such as land disposal and underground injection, as well as transfers of wastes to other communities. Finally, we report evidence that some waste streams are increasing in toxicity, an effect that may outweigh the benefits of reductions in releases. ∗UBC, Department of Political Science, 1866 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada. Phone: +1-604822-4922. Fax: +1-604-822-5540. E-mail: [email protected]. Kathryn Harrison gratefully acknowledges the support of the Social Scienes and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Canada-US Fulbright program, and Resources for the Future. The authors would like to thank Jen Baggs for sharing results of her work, and Andrea Podhorsky and Jessica Richardson for research assistance. †UBC, Faculty of Commerce, 2053 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada. Phone: +1-604-822-8484. Fax: +1-604-822-8477. E-mail: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Using Alternative Regulatory Instruments to Control Fixed Point Air Pollution in Developing Countries: Lessons from International Experience
Should developing countries eschew conventional command and control regulatory instruments that are increasingly seen as inefficient and rely instead on 'alternative' instruments based on economic incentives and community pressure? This paper addresses this question as it pertains to fixed point air pollution. The paper discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of alternative instr...
متن کاملPollution regulation and abatement efforts: evidence from China
This paper empirically tests pollution abatement efforts of Chinese industries in response to pollution regulations, especially the pollution charge instrument practiced in China for about 20 years. The impacts of pollution regulation on abatement expenditures are examined for one thousand large and medium Chinese industrial polluters. The results show that plant-level expenditures on end-of-pi...
متن کاملEconomic Instruments for Pollution Control and Prevention – A Brief Overview
The key benefit of economic (or fiscal) instruments is that they would allow a given pollution target to be met for lower overall cost than traditional regulations a considerable advantage given the perceived high financial burden of regulatory compliance. There are other benefits too. Economic instruments grant firms and individuals greater autonomy in deciding how to meet targets; they create...
متن کاملHow the Chinese System of Charges and Subsidies Affects Pollution Control Efforts by China’s Top Industrial Polluters
While there are extensive theoretical studies on firms’ responses to environmental regulations and enforcement, there are few empirical analyses of firms’ expenditures on pollution abatement in responding to different regulations and enforcement strategies. This paper presents an empirical analysis of pollution abatement efforts of Chinese industrial firms under a combination of pollution charg...
متن کاملEmissions Trading, Electricity Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement
When the US federal government first began regulating major sources of air pollution in the 1960s, the conventional approach to meeting air quality standards involved establishing maximum emissions rates or technology based standards for regulated stationary sources. However, economists have long maintained that an emissions permit market could more efficiently coordinate pollution abatement ac...
متن کامل