Explanations and Recommendations for Temporal Inconsistencies

نویسندگان

  • John L. Bresina
  • Paul H. Morris
چکیده

This paper presents an approach to automatically providing explanations and recommendations for temporal inconsistencies within the context of constraint-based, mixed-initiative planning. In this style of planning, a user operation can cause the planner’s temporal constraint network to become inconsistent. For example, if a partial plan has been built and the user is trying to add another activity into the plan, an inconsistency will arise if the activity’s associated constraints conflict with the current plan’s constraints. In such cases, it is helpful if the system can explain to the user why the user’s operation led to the inconsistency, and it is even better if the system can give the user recommendations on how to fix the inconsistency. Our approach to explanation and recommendation is generally applicable to constraint-based reasoning systems; however, the motivation and validation of our approach derive from a deployed planning system for planetary rover missions.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Explanations make inconsistencies harder to detect

What role do explanations play in reasoning about inconsistencies? We postulate that when people create explanations, they use them to resolve conflicting information. This hypothesis predicts that inconsistencies should be harder to detect once individuals have in mind an explanation of the inconsistency. We report four experiments that tested this prediction. Experiments 1a and 1b corroborate...

متن کامل

The need to explain.

How do reasoners deal with inconsistencies? James (1907) believed that the rational solution is to revise your beliefs and to do so in a minimal way. We propose an alternative: You explain the origins of an inconsistency, which has the side effect of a revision to your beliefs. This hypothesis predicts that individuals should spontaneously create explanations of inconsistencies rather than refu...

متن کامل

Hidden conflicts: explanations make inconsistencies harder to detect.

A rational response to an inconsistent set of propositions is to revise it in a minimal way to restore consistency. A more important psychological goal is usually to create an explanation that resolves the inconsistency. We report five studies showing that once individuals have done so, they find inconsistencies harder to detect. Experiment 1 established the effect when participants explained i...

متن کامل

What does convergent evolution mean? The interpretation of convergence and its implications in the search for limits to evolution.

Convergent evolution is central to the study of life's evolutionary history. Researchers have documented the ubiquity of convergence and have used this ubiquity to make inferences about the nature of limits on evolution. However, these inferences are compromised by unrecognized inconsistencies in the definitions, measures, significance tests and inferred causes of convergent evolution. I review...

متن کامل

Online learning of positive and negative prototypes with explanations based on kernel expansion

The issue of classification is still a topic of discussion in many current articles. Most of the models presented in the articles suffer from a lack of explanation for a reason comprehensible to humans. One way to create explainability is to separate the weights of the network into positive and negative parts based on the prototype. The positive part represents the weights of the correct class ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006