Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis
نویسندگان
چکیده
1Above all, I’d like to thank Paul Kay for hours of discussion and useful feedback at every stage in the seemingly endless process of writing this chapter. I’m also grateful to Chuck Fillmore and Laura Michaelis for many useful discussions of both content and exposition and for comments on an earlier draft, which was also been improved by the comments of Rui Chaves, Adele Goldberg, Bill Croft, Adam Przepiórkowski, Russell Lee-Goldman, and Hans Boas. In addition, discussions with the following people have been quite helpful: Farrell Ackerman, Emily Bender, Dan Flickinger, Mark Gawron, Andreas Kathol, Beth Levin, Bob Levine, Stefan Müller, Frank Van Eynde, Tom Wasow, Gert Webelhuth, and Steve Wechsler. None of the views expressed here should be attributed to any of these individuals; nor should they be held responsible for any remaining errors. 2 SBCG owes a considerable debt to the implementation work carried out within CSLI’s LinGO Lab and the DELPHIN consortium, whose grammar development efforts have proceeded in parallel with the evolution of SBCG. See Copestake 2001, Flickinger 2000, Uszkoreit et al. 2000, and the online resources available at http://lingo.stanford.edu/ and http://www.delph-in.net/. 3See Pollard and Sag 1987 Pollard and Sag 1994, Ginzburg and Sag 2000, and Richter 2004, inter alia.
منابع مشابه
Segment Grammar
Incremental sentence generation imposes special constraints on the representation of the grammar and the design of the formulator (the module which is responsible for constructing the syntactic and morphological structure). In the model of natural speech production presented here, a formalism called Segment Grammar (SG; Kempen, 1987) is used for the representation of linguistic knowledge. One b...
متن کاملA comparison between Fluid Construction Grammar and Sign-Based Construction Grammar
Construction Grammar has reached a stage of maturity where many researchers are looking for an explicit formal grounding of their work. Recently, there have been exciting developments to cater for this demand, most notably in Sign-Based Construction Grammar (SBCG) and Fluid Construction Grammar (FCG). Unfortunately, like playing a music instrument, the formalisms used by SBCG and FCG take time ...
متن کاملSign-Based Construction Grammar
In Construction Grammar, rules of syntactic combination (descriptions of local trees, e.g., a verb phrase and its daughters) have meanings. These meanings are represented by syntactic, semantic and usage features that attach to the mother or daughter nodes in these trees (Sag 2007, 2008). A construction defines the distinctive properties of a mode of combination that is part of the grammar of a...
متن کاملConstruction Grammar and the Syntax-Semantics Interface
A foundational assumption of traditional generative grammar is that a grammar is organized in the mind of the speaker as a number of hermetically sealed modules, which in the course of a derivation hand off data one to the other.1 Sign-Based Construction Grammar (SBCG) assumes that the grammar contains no such modules, but rather that grammar is an inventory of signs, complexes of linguistic co...
متن کاملConstruction Grammar: The Facts on the Ground
In Construction Grammar, rules of syntactic combination (descriptions of local trees, e.g., a verb phrase and its daughters) have meanings. These meanings are represented by syntactic, semantic and usage features that attach to the mother or daughter nodes in these trees (Sag 2007, 2008). A construction defines the distinctive properties of a mode of combination that is part of the grammar of a...
متن کامل