Commentary Reproducible Epidemiologic Research
نویسندگان
چکیده
The replication of important findings by multiple independent investigators is fundamental to the accumulation of scientific evidence. Researchers in the biologic and physical sciences expect results to be replicated by independent data, analytical methods, laboratories, and instruments. Epidemiologic studies are commonly used to quantify small health effects of important, but subtle, risk factors, and replication is of critical importance where results can inform substantial policy decisions. However, because of the time, expense, and opportunism of many current epidemiologic studies, it is often impossible to fully replicate their findings. An attainable minimum standard is ‘‘reproducibility,’’ which calls for data sets and software to be made available for verifying published findings and conducting alternative analyses. The authors outline a standard for reproducibility and evaluate the reproducibility of current epidemiologic research. They also propose methods for reproducible research and implement them by use of a case study in air pollution and health.
منابع مشابه
Invited commentary: Epidemiologic studies of the health associations of environmental exposures with preterm birth.
In this issue of the Journal, two different articles present epidemiologic evidence supporting the hypotheses that environmental exposures to particulate air pollution or higher temperatures modestly increase the risk of preterm birth. In this commentary, the author discusses environmental epidemiologic methods through the lens of these two papers with respect to the causal question, measuremen...
متن کاملEpidemiologic approaches to injury and violence.
This volume of Epidemiologic Reviews features 13 articles covering a variety of injury problems and research topics. In this commentary, the authors highlight the remarkable achievements in injury control and the important role the Haddon Matrix has played in understanding injury causation and developing preventive strategies; comment on the individual articles included in this volume in the br...
متن کاملInvited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies.
In their commentary in this issue of the Journal, Colditz et al. (1) have made a number of interesting points and raised some equally interesting questions related to heterogeneity in meta-analyses of epidemiologic data. In selecting a title for this invited commentary, I have chosen to emphasize explicitly the positive aspects of heterogeneity. I would like to complement (and compliment) the m...
متن کاملInvited Commentary Invited Commentary: Topical Threats to Epidemiology
Epidemiologic studies are subject to social and cultural influences, which can influence the way samples are identified or included and information is collected. In this commentary, the author highlights issues related to several factors that may influence current research methods, such as changes in telephone use and new ethical guidelines. Technologic developments that have the potential to p...
متن کاملNeurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal famine: The story of the Dutch Famine Study.
The Dutch Famine Study (1) was one of the classic epidemiologic investigations that emerged from the Columbia University School of Public Health in the 1960s. In accord with its initial aim, the study has produced precious clues as to the role of prenatal nutrition in the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders; yet the findings and their implications have emerged piecemeal, over decades. To o...
متن کامل