Learning Cost-Effective and Interpretable Treatment Regimes for Judicial Bail Decisions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Decision makers, such as judges, make crucial choices regarding judicial bail decisions on a daily basis. Such decisions typically involve careful assessment of the subject’s (or defendant’s) condition, analyzing the costs associated with the possible actions, and the nature of the consequent outcomes. Further, there might be costs associated with the assessment of the subject’s condition itself. For instance, a judge deciding if a defendant should be granted bail studies the criminal records of the defendant, and enquires for additional information (e.g., defendant’s personal life or economic status) if needed. She then recommends a course of action (or treatment)1 that trades off the risk with granting bail to the defendant (the defendant may commit a new crime when out on bail) with the cost of denying bail (adverse effects on defendant, or defendant’s family, cost of jail to the county).
منابع مشابه
Learning Cost-Effective and Interpretable Treatment Regimes
Decision makers, such as doctors and judges, make crucial decisions such as recommending treatments to patients, and granting bail to defendants on a daily basis. Such decisions typically involve weighing the potential benefits of taking an action against the costs involved. In this work, we aim to automate this task of learning cost-effective, interpretable and actionable treatment regimes. We...
متن کاملLearning Cost-Effective Treatment Regimes using Markov Decision Processes
Decision makers, such as doctors and judges, make crucial decisions such as recommending treatments to patients, and granting bails to defendants on a daily basis. Such decisions typically involve weighting the potential benefits of taking an action against the costs involved. In this work, we aim to automate this task of learning cost-effective, interpretable and actionable treatment regimes. ...
متن کاملLearning Cost-Effective and Interpretable Regimes for Treatment Recommendation
Decision makers, such as doctors, make crucial decisions such as recommending treatments to patients on a daily basis. Such decisions typically involve careful assessment of the subject’s condition, analyzing the costs associated with the possible actions, and the nature of the consequent outcomes. Further, there might be costs associated with the assessment of the subject’s condition itself (e...
متن کاملFrom discretion to disagreement: explaining disparities in judges' pretrial decisions.
Judges are afforded considerable discretion in decision-making. Through their exercise of discretion, judges construct society's notion of crime and justice. This study examined 61 lay judges' bail decision-making in the English criminal justice system. The law states that in particular cases decisions to grant bail or remand in custody should be based on the risk of a defendant absconding, off...
متن کاملUsing decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.
A treatment regime formalizes personalized medicine as a function from individual patient characteristics to a recommended treatment. A high-quality treatment regime can improve patient outcomes while reducing cost, resource consumption, and treatment burden. Thus, there is tremendous interest in estimating treatment regimes from observational and randomized studies. However, the development of...
متن کامل