Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To gain understanding of general practitioners' and patients' opinions of the routine introduction of standardised measures of severity of depression through the UK general practice quality and outcomes framework. DESIGN Semistructured qualitative interview study, with purposive sampling and constant comparative analysis. PARTICIPANTS 34 general practitioners and 24 patients. SETTING 38 general practices in three sites in England: Southampton, Liverpool, and Norfolk. RESULTS Patients generally favoured the measures of severity for depression, whereas general practitioners were generally cautious about the validity and utility of such measures and sceptical about the motives behind their introduction. Both general practitioners and patients considered that assessments of severity should be seen as one aspect of holistic care. General practitioners considered their practical wisdom and clinical judgment ("phronesis") to be more important than objective assessments and were concerned that the assessments reduced the human element of the consultation. Patients were more positive about the questionnaires, seeing them as an efficient and structured supplement to medical judgment and as evidence that general practitioners were taking their problems seriously through a full assessment. General practitioners and patients were aware of the potential for manipulation of indicators: for economic reasons for doctors and for patients to avoid stigma or achieve desired outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Despite general practitioners' caution about measures of severity for depression, these may benefit primary care consultations by increasing patients' confidence that general practitioners are correct in their diagnosis and are making systematic efforts to assess and manage their mental health problems. Further education of primary care staff may optimise the use and interpretation of depression questionnaires.
منابع مشابه
Assessing depression severity using the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework depression indicators: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND Depression is a major cause of chronic ill-health and is managed in primary care. Indicators on depression severity assessment were introduced into the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in 2006 and 2009. QOF is a pay-for-performance scheme and indicators should have evidence to support their use; potential unintended consequences should also have been considered. AIM To revie...
متن کاملHealth outcomes, education, healthcare delivery and quality – 3047. What do patients think about asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires? Qualitative interview study in the UK
Methods 22 adult individuals with asthma were asked to complete three asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires (Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-J), Sydney Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-S), Living With Asthma Questionnaire (LWAQ)). Interviews were conducted to elicit patients’ views on the content validity of the questionnaires and transcribed verbatim. Them...
متن کاملA qualitative study of patients' views on quality of primary care consultations in Hong Kong and comparison with the UK CARE Measure
BACKGROUND Patients' priorities and views on quality care are well-documented in Western countries but there is a dearth of research in this area in the East. The aim of the present study was to explore Chinese patients' views on quality of primary care consultations in Hong Kong and to compare these with the items in the CARE measure (a process measure of consultation quality widely used in th...
متن کاملThe effects of financial incentives for case finding for depression in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease: interrupted time series analysis
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) incentivised case finding for depression on diagnosis and treatment in targeted and non-targeted long-term conditions. DESIGN Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING General practices in Leeds, UK. PARTICIPANTS 65 (58%) of 112 general practices shared data on 37,229 patients with diabetes and coronary heart diseas...
متن کاملP24: Religious/Spiritual Coping in Childhood Cystic Fibrosis: a Qualitative Study
To understand the role of religiousness/spirituality in coping in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Participants were a convenience sample of 23 patients with CF, ages 5 to 12 years and their parent(s) in an ambulatory CF clinic. The design was a focused ethnography including in-depth interviews with children and parent(s), children’s drawings and self-administered written parental questionna...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ
دوره 338 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009