Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared

نویسندگان

  • Kesten C. Green
  • J. Scott Armstrong
  • Andreas Graefe
چکیده

Traditional groups meetings are an inefficient and ineffective method for making forecasts and decisions. We compare two structured alternatives to traditional meetings: the Delphi technique and prediction markets. Delphi is relatively simple and cheap to implement and has been adopted for diverse applications in business and government since its origins in the 1950s. It can be used for nearly any forecasting, estimation, or decision making problem not barred by complexity or ignorance. While prediction markets were used more than a century ago, their popularity waned until more recent times. Prediction markets can be run continuously, and they motivate participation and participants to reveal their true beliefs. On the other hand, they need many participants and clear outcomes in order to determine pay-offs. Moreover, translating knowledge into a price is not intuitive to everyone and constructing contracts that will provide a useful forecast may not be possible for some problems. It is difficult to maintain confidentiality with markets and they are vulnerable to manipulation. Delphi is designed to reveal panelists’ knowledge and opinions via their forecasts and the reasoning they provide. This format allows testing of knowledge and learning by panelists as they refine their forecasts but may also lead to conformity due to group pressure. The reasoning provided as an output of the Delphi process is likely to be reassuring to forecast users who are uncomfortable with the “black box” nature of prediction markets. We consider that, half a century after its original development, Delphi is under-utilized. Disciplines Business | Marketing Comments Suggested Citation: Green, K.C., Armstrong, J.S. and Graefe, A. (2007). Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared. Foresight. Issue 8. This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/marketing_papers/157 Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared Kesten C. Green Business and Economic Forecasting Unit, Monash University, [email protected] J. Scott Armstrong, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Andreas Graefe Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Research Center (Forschungszentrum) Karlsruhe [email protected] Forthcoming in Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting (Fall 2007) This working paper offers a more detailed treatment of the issue than was provided in the published version.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

M P Ra Methods to Elicit Forecasts from Groups: Delphi and Prediction Markets Compared

Traditional groups meetings are an inefficient and ineffective method for making forecasts and decisions. We compare two structured alternatives to traditional meetings: the Delphi technique and prediction markets. Delphi is relatively simple and cheap to implement and has been adopted for diverse applications in business and government since its origins in the 1950s. It can be used for nearly ...

متن کامل

Comparing Face-to-Face Meetings, Nominal Groups, Delphi and Prediction Markets on an Estimation Task

We conducted laboratory experiments to analyze the accuracy of three structured approaches (nominal groups, Delphi, and prediction markets) compared to traditional face-to-face meetings (FTF). We recruited 227 participants (11 groups per method) that had to solve a quantitative judgment task that did not involve distributed knowledge. This task consisted of ten factual questions, which required...

متن کامل

The Intelligence Game: Assessing Delphi Groups and Structured Question Formats

In 2010, the US Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) announced a 4-year forecasting “tournament”. Five collaborative research teams are attempting to outperform a baseline opinion pool in predicting hundreds of geopolitical, economic and military events. We are contributing to one of these teams by eliciting forecasts from Delphi-style groups in the US and Australia. We elic...

متن کامل

Prediction Markets versus Alternative Methods. Empirical Tests of Accuracy and Acceptability

he success of prediction markets in the field of election forecasting made them increasingly appealing to organizations and a number of companies started to experiment with them. However, despite widespread initial interest and years of experimental use, there are no major organizations known to use prediction markets as an integral part of their forecasting activities. Prediction markets have ...

متن کامل

Sports Forecasting: A Comparison of the Forecast Accuracy of Prediction Markets, Betting Odds and Tipsters

This article compares the forecast accuracy of different methods, namely prediction markets, tipsters and betting odds, and assesses the ability of prediction markets and tipsters to generate profi ts systematically in a betting market. We present the results of an empirical study that uses data from 678–837 games of three seasons of the German premier soccer league. Prediction markets and bett...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007