hemodynamic responses to two different anesthesia regimens in compromised left ventricular function patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: etomidate-midazolam versus propofol-ketamine

conclusions both anesthetic regimens were acceptable for induction in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. results incidence of pain on injection (2 - 4%) and myoclonus (10%) was less in both groups. the hemodynamic response was similar in the two groups for all variables over the time interval, except for ci at one and three minutes after intubation (p = 0.024 and p = 0.048, respectively), and svr in five minutes after intubation (p = 0.009), with differences being statistically significant. patients and methods one-hundred patients aged between 40 and 65 with coronary artery disease and low ejection fraction scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery participated in this study. the patients were randomly allotted to one of the two groups to receive either propofol-ketamine or etomidate-midazolam combination. two groups were compared for pain on injection and myoclonus, heart rate (hr), systolic blood pressure (sbp), diastolic blood pressure (dbp), mean arterial pressure (map), cardiac index (ci) and systemic vascular resistance (svr), before and one minute after induction of anesthesia, and one, three and five minutes after intubation. objectives the aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of etomidate-midazolam by comparing it with propofol-ketamine for the induction of anesthesia in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. background various methods have been suggested to prevent hemodynamic instability caused by propofol and adverse effects caused by etomidate induction. the current study evaluated hemodynamic effects of propofol-ketamine mixture in comparison to etomidate-midazolam mixture during anesthesia induction.