outcome of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in the gnrh agonist versus antagonist protocol
نویسندگان
چکیده
background: gnrh agonist and antagonist were developed to control the premature release of lh surge. there is some difference between two protocols. objective: we compared the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in infertile women who used gnrh agonist or antagonist protocol for previous coh cycle and evaluation of any adverse effect of gnrh antagonist on oocyte and embryo. materials and methods: the study group included all infertile women who referred to yazd research and clinical center for infertility. overall 20-35 years old women who were candidate for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with regard to inclusion and exclusion criteria were participated in the study. the patients based on previous control ovarian stimulation (coh) protocol divided in to two groups: gnrh agonist long protocol (n=165) and gnrh antagonist multiple dose protocol (n=165). frozen-thawed embryos were transferred after endometrial preparation in both groups. main outcome measures were: implantation, chemical and clinical pregnancy rate. results: the implantation and clinical pregnancy rate following cryopreserved embryo transfer in gnrh agonist group and antagonist group were 16.3% vs. 15.7% (p=0.806) and 38.1% (63/165) vs. 36.9% (61/165) (p=0.915) and chemical pregnancy rate was 44.8% (74/165) vs. 43.6% (72/165) (p=0.915) respectively. conclusion: there was no statistically difference between two groups in terms of implantation and pregnancy rate. although pregnancy rate in fresh embryo transfer in antagonist cycles was lower than agonist groups, therefore decrease in these parameters might be due to detrimental effect of gnrh antagonist on the endometrium, not embryo or oocyte.
منابع مشابه
Outcome of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in the GnRH agonist versus antagonist protocol
BACKGROUND GnRH agonist and antagonist were developed to control the premature release of LH surge. There is some difference between two protocols. OBJECTIVE We compared the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in infertile women who used GnRH agonist or antagonist protocol for previous COH cycle and evaluation of any adverse effect of GnRH antagonist on oocyte and embryo. MATERIALS AND...
متن کاملGnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET)
Several protocols are actually available for in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. The review summarizes the main differences and the clinic characteristics of the protocols in use with GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists by emphasizing the major outcomes and hormonal changes associated with each protocol. The majority of randomized clinical trials clearly shows that in "in Vitro" Fertiliz...
متن کاملFlexible Multi-dose GnRH Antagonist versus Long GnRH Agonist Protocol in Poor Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background To compare a flexible, multi-dose GnRH antagonist protocol with a long GnRH .agonist protocol in poor respo MaterialsAndMethods A randomized clinical trial of 70 poor responder patients (35 patients in GnRH antagonist protocol and 35 patients in long GnRH agonist protocol) was performed at Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. Both groups were given a fixed dose of human menopausal gonadotr...
متن کاملEffects of single dose GnRH agonist as luteal support on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: an RCT
BACKGROUND There is no doubt that luteal phase support is essential to enhance the reproductive outcome in IVF cycles. In addition to progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin, several studies have described GnRH agonists as luteal phase support to improve implantation rate, pregnancy rate and live birth rate, whereas other studies showed dissimilar conclusions. All of these studies have be...
متن کاملeffects of single dose gnrh agonist as luteal support on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: an rct
background: there is no doubt that luteal phase support is essential to enhance the reproductive outcome in ivf cycles. in addition to progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin, several studies have described gnrh agonists as luteal phase support to improve implantation rate, pregnancy rate and live birth rate, whereas other studies showed dissimilar conclusions. all of these studies have b...
متن کاملComparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.
BACKGROUND In view of the discrepancies about the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) ovarian stimulation protocols having some potential advantages compared with the GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) protocols in poor ovarian responders IVF/ICSI, a meta-analysis of the published data was performed to compare the efficacy of GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a protocols for ovarian stimulation in IVF poor response patients. M...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
international journal of reproductive biomedicineجلد ۱۰، شماره ۴، صفحات ۲۹۷-۰
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023