punitive damages in international law
نویسندگان
چکیده
punitive damages are not compensation for injury and is levied to punish reprehensible conduct of defendant and to deter its future occurrence. common law is the base of this approach. according to the u.k. house of lords, there are some restrictions in levying this kind of damage. these restrictions have been fully respected by the courts of all the commonwealth states except australia and the united states. even in the united states this approach has been recently extended to cases in which a foreign state is a defendant. this practice poses the question of the legality of punitive damages in international law. a study of international responsibility rules and relevant case law shows that although there are some similarities between punitive damages and satisfaction in international rules of state responsibility, it is not principally permitted to pass a judgment on punitive damages against a state. therefore, the recent practice of the united states courts in convicting foreign states including islamic republic of iran is a violation of international law and entails in international responsibility of that state.
منابع مشابه
Do Punitive Damages Promote Deterrence?
The paper explores the deterrent effect of punitive damages when capital investment is endogenous to the legal rule. Irrespective of the level of damages, firms can reduce their expected liabilities by either increasing safety (the law’s intended goal) or reducing wealth exposed to liability. We show that punitive damages can exacerbate this wealth reduction effect and thereby reduce deterrence...
متن کاملPunitive Damages and Private Ordering Fetishism
Let me begin with some words of warm thanks, first to Professors Michael Krauss and David Owen for engaging my work with attention and interest and, second, to the editors at PENNumbra, for soliciting my reactions. This Reply’s principal goal is to clarify some areas in which I think Professors Krauss and Owen misunderstood some aspects of my proposed framework for restructuring punitive damage...
متن کاملPunitive Damages: How Judges and Juries Perform
A substantial recent literature has documented the inability of jurors to make sound decisions with respect to punitive damages, particularly for health, safety, and environmental torts. Included in this literature are experimental studies documenting the better performance of judges than jurors for the same case scenarios. Recent research by Eisenberg et al. (2002) has suggested, however, that...
متن کاملA Theory of Wealth and Punitive Damages
One recurring problem in the punitive damages case law is the degree to which the wealth of the defendant should matter in the determination of a punitive award. Intuition suggests that the wealthy should pay more than the non-wealthy. On the other hand, the view has been expressed that wealth should not play a role in the determination of a punitive award. I will use examples to develop severa...
متن کاملEnvironmental Citizen Suits with Pigovian Punitive Damages
Federal environmental laws encourage private citizens to act like "private attorney generals" and to sue a firm. This citizen group competes over the rewards of levels of regulation and enforcement. The firm can reduce its output to curtail the likelihood of losing the contest. This paper explores whether one can combine citizen suits with Pigovian punitive damages to equate private and social ...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
مجله حقوقی بین المللیجلد ۲۱، شماره شماره ۳۰ (بهار و تابستان)، صفحات ۸۵-۱۱۸
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023