strict liability; foundations and instances

نویسندگان

حسن بادینی

استادیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران هادی شعبانی کندسری

کارشناس ارشد حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه علوم قضایی تهران سجاد رادپرور

کارشناس ارشد حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه گیلان

چکیده

strict liability is the result of philosophical ideas of lawyers in front of developments in human knowledge and complexity of social relationships. strict liability the main aim is facilitation of victim's compensation, so the proof of fault is not necessary and causation is sufficient. this type of liability is justified by various foundations of economics, society and morality. in the beginning, strict liability was peculiar to dangerous activities, but has expanded in conjunction with the emergence of private insurance and social security that have transformed the aims and functions of tort law. in iranian and islamic law there are many instances of this liability. for example, we can mention tort liability for destruction of properties (etlaf), tort liability of physician, some instances of personal injury law (diyeh). in some new laws such as law relating to compulsory insurance of tort liability of possessors of motor and rail vehicles, strict liability has been accepted implicitly, but in other fields like products liability and liability of providers of services, has been rejected because of incompatibility with traditional rules. anyway, conditions and necessities of modern life demands that strict liability be accepted in other dangerous activities which impose non-reciprocal risks to other members of society.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Pollution Externalities: Social Cost and Strict Liability

This paper critically considers the neoclassical social-cost approach to problems of pollution. This traditional approach, when subjected to close scrutiny, is found to be seriously wanting in applicability and consistency. A less ambitious alternative based on notions of strict liability is offered. The social-cost approach is an offshoot of the “new welfare economics~’developed during the las...

متن کامل

Strict versus Negligence Software Product Liability

The law of products liability in tort is designed to maintain a reasonable balance between the inevitable social costs and the benefits of innovative product technologies. Technological development must be supported not only for the best interests of the public but also the side effect namely product defect into one of the following: (1) manufacturing defect; failures to correctly implement saf...

متن کامل

Strict Liability versus Negligence in Indiana Harbor

In January of 1979, a railroad tank car containing the chemical acrylonitrile started leaking at a rail yard in south suburban Chicago. The chemical was manufactured by American Cyanamid Co (Cyanamid) in Louisiana. Cyanamid had leased the tank car, filled it with acrylonitrile, and delivered it to the Missouri Pacific Railroad for transport to the Chicago suburbs. The leak occurred while the ca...

متن کامل

Criminal Law Reform and the Persistence of Strict Liability

Two reform movements transformed American criminal law in the quarter century that began in the late 1960s. Their origins and effects were starkly different, and their conflict meant that, on core choices about the basis for criminal liability, one movement had to win and the other had to lose. The first movement was the wave of criminal code reform inspired by the American Law Institute’s Mode...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
مجله مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی

جلد ۳، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۹-۳۶

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023