assessing practitioners’ and patients’ needs regarding shared decision-making and decision aids

نویسندگان

michiel hageman orthopaedic hand and upper extremity service, yawkey center, massachusetts general hospital, boston, usa

jeroen bossen orthopaedic hand and upper extremity service, yawkey center, massachusetts general hospital, boston, usa

valentin neuhaus orthopaedic hand and upper extremity service, yawkey center, massachusetts general hospital, boston, usa

chaitanya mudgal orthopaedic hand and upper extremity service, yawkey center, massachusetts general hospital, boston, usa

چکیده

background: as part of the process of developing a decision aid for carpal tunnel syndrome (cts) according to the ottawa decision support framework, we were interested in the level of ‘decisional conflict’ of hand surgeons and patients with cts. this study addresses the null hypothesis that there is no difference between surgeon and patient decisional conflict with respect to test and treatment options for cts. secondary analyses assess the impact of patient and physician demographics and the strength of the patient-physician relationship on decisional conflict.   methods: one-hundred-twenty-three observers of the science of variation group (sovg) and 84 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome completed a survey regarding the decisional conflict scale. patients also filled out the pain self-efficacy questionnaire (pseq) and the patient doctor relationship questionnaire (pdrq-9).   results: on average, patients had significantly greater decision conflict and scored higher on most subscales of the decisional conflict scale than hand surgeons.factors associated with greater decision conflict were specific hand surgeon, less self-efficacy (confidence that one can achieve one’s goals in spite of pain), and higher pdrq (relationship between patient and doctor). surgeons from europe have--on average--significantly more decision conflict than surgeons in the united states of america.   conclusions: patients with cts have more decision conflict than hand surgeons. decision aids might help narrow this gap in decisional conflict.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Assessing Practitioners’ and Patients’ Needs Regarding Shared Decision-Making and Decision Aids

       Background: As part of the process of developing a decision aid for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we were interested in the level of ‘decisional conflict’ of hand surgeons and patients with CTS. This study addresses the null hypothesis that there is no difference between surgeon and patient decisional conflict with respect to test and tr...

متن کامل

Shared decision making and patient decision aids in dermatology.

Shared decision making combines individual patient interests and values with clinical best evidence under the guiding principle of patient autonomy. Patient decision aids can support shared decision making and facilitate decisions that have multiple options with varying outcomes for which patients may attribute different values. Given the variable psychosocial impact of skin disease on individu...

متن کامل

Shared decision-making and patient decision AIDS: is it time?

The quality and cost of medical care is determined in large part by the decisions that clinicians and patients make every day about seeking care, having tests, starting treatments, and stopping treatments. There are situations in medicine in which a treatment or approach has considerable evidence of significant benefit with minimal or no harm. High-quality decisions in these situations are abou...

متن کامل

The potential for shared decision-making and decision aids in rehabilitation medicine.

OBJECTIVE Shared decision-making and the use of decision aids are increasingly promoted in various healthcare settings. The extent of their current use and potential in rehabilitation medicine is unknown. The aim of the present study was to explore the barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making and use of decision aids in daily practice, and to explore the perceptions of physical an...

متن کامل

Shared Decision Making Supported by Patient Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment

El cáncer de próstata es un problema importante para los hombres mayores en países desarrollados. Las decisiones acerca del screening y tratamiento del cáncer de próstata se caracterizan por múltiples opciones razonables que parecen “arriesgadas”, donde las preferencias personales de los pacientes son importantes. Se va reconociendo de modo creciente la toma de decisión compartida entre el paci...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
the archives of bone and joint surgery

جلد ۴، شماره ۲، صفحات ۱۵۰-۱۵۵

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023