project management of randomized clinical trials: a narrative review

conclusions project management may benefit both the managerial and scientific aspects of medical projects and reduce fund waste. however, little has been written to date on project management in the context of clinical research. the suggestions represent the views of the individual authors. to provide a high level of evidence in this regard, we recommend that a randomized controlled trial be performed to compare trial projects progressed with and without the use of project management. evidence acquisition using multiple search strategies, we conducted a literature review on published studies in the english language from 2002 to 2012 by searching the cochrane database of systematic reviews, medline, google scholar, and embase. results our review suggests that a successful trial requires a work plan or work scope as well as a timeline. the trial manager should subsequently manage the study in accordance with the plan and the timeline. many research units have called for a clinical project manager with scientific background and regulatory skills to effect coordination among various aspects of a clinical trial. context a well-structured protocol for a clinical trial may be able to answer clinical questions, but it cannot be deemed enough to ensure success in the face of incompetent management of time as well as human and economic resources. to address this problem, in this article, we present our literature review on evidence as to how a good knowledge of proper management among researchers can enhance the likelihood of the success of clinical trial projects.