Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
1 Information and the Divergence between Willingness - to - Accept and Willingness - to - Pay
There is considerable empirical and experimental evidence that there is a divergence between willingness-to-accept compensation to give up a good and willingness-to-pay to obtain a good. This divergence persists even when the good in question in small relative to income, a result in apparent conflict with standard economic theory. This paper develops a theoretical bidding model with costly info...
متن کاملPreference reversals and disparities between willingness to pay and willingness to accept in repeated markets
Previous studies suggest that two otherwise robust ‘anomalies’ – preference reversals and disparities between buying and selling valuations – are eroded when respondents participate in repeated markets. We report an experiment which investigates whether this is true when factors neglected in previous studies are controlled, and which distinguishes between anomalies revealed in the behaviour of ...
متن کاملStudy of Patients’ Willingness to Pay for a Cure of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Taiwan
OBJECTIVES Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the fastest growing causes of death worldwide. However, few studies, if any, have been conducted that have investigated patient profiles in Asia. This paper analyzes patient willingness to pay (WTP) as a function of patient disease severity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and smoking behavior in Taiwan. STUDY DESIGN A c...
متن کاملA n exact relation between willingness to pay and willingness to accept *
I present a simple and precise relationship between the willingness-to-pay and the willingness-to-accept, or equivalently between the compensating and equivalent variations following an exogenous welfare change. One can be computed given the other as a function of income. 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
متن کاملDoes Anonymity Affect the Willingness To Accept and Willingness To Pay Gap?
Conventional value-elicitation experiments often find subjects provide higher valuations for items they posses than for identical items they may acquire. Plott and Zeiler (2005) find no difference in elicited valuations after implementing procedures that provide for anonymity and experience with the second-price mechanism. This paper investigates whether anonymity is a necessary for their resul...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Public Health
سال: 1986
ISSN: 0090-0036,1541-0048
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.392