When “Better” is better than “Best”
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider two-player normal form games where each player has the same finite strategy set. The payoffs of are assumed to be i.i.d. random variables with a continuous distribution. show that, high probability, better-response dynamics converges pure Nash equilibrium whenever there is one, whereas best-response fails converge, as it trapped.
منابع مشابه
When poll is better than interrupt
In a traditional block I/O path, the operating system completes virtually all I/Os asynchronously via interrupts. However, performing storage I/O with ultra-low latency devices using next-generation non-volatile memory, it can be shown that polling for the completion – hence wasting clock cycles during the I/O – delivers higher performance than traditional interrupt-driven I/O. This paper thus ...
متن کاملWhen Virtual is Better than Real
This position paper argues that the operating system and applications currently running on a real machine should relocate into a virtual machine. This structure enables services to be added below the operating system and to do so without trusting or modifying the operating system or applications. To demonstrate the usefulness of this structure , we describe three services that take advantage of...
متن کاملWhen Two Is Better Than One
Looking for the perfect sequencing instrument for your next experiment? As Jeffrey Perkel finds out, you might just need more than one.
متن کاملWhen conversation is better than computation.
While largely ignored in informatics thinking, the clinical communication space accounts for the major part of the information flow in health care. Growing evidence indicates that errors in communication give rise to substantial clinical morbidity and mortality. This paper explores the implications of acknowledging the primacy of the communication space in informatics and explores some solution...
متن کاملWhen Good = Better Than Average
People report themselves to be above average on simple tasks and below average on difficult tasks. This paper builds on prior research demonstrating this effect and proposes a simpler explanation for it: that people easily conflate relative with absolute evaluation, especially on ambiguous measures of evaluation. The paper then presents a series of four studies that examine this conflation expl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Operations Research Letters
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0167-6377', '1872-7468']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2021.01.009