What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reviewing Scientific Manuscripts: A Comprehensive Guide for Peer Reviewers.
86 The abstract provides the authors with an opportunity to summarize the objectives, methods, 87 results and conclusions for the journal readers. It is oftentimes the first, and perhaps only, section 88 of the manuscript that will be read as it is typically freely available through reference databases. 89 The abstract should provide a clear statement of the study objectives, which must match w...
متن کاملReviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
BACKGROUND The importance of peer review in the furthering of science cannot be overstated. However, most doctoral students and early career professionals receive little formal or informal training in conducting peer reviews. PURPOSE In recognition of this deficit in peer reviewer training, the present article was developed to provide an overview of the peer-review process at Annals of Behavi...
متن کاملDiagnostic and therapeutic challenges for dermatologists: What shall we do when we don’t know what to do?
What shall we do when we have done everything we could for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient, but were not successful? What shall we do when there is no definite treatment for a patient? What shall we do when we have no diagnosis or treatment for a patient? Some useful suggestions are presented here to get rid of these situations.
متن کاملA guide to reviewing manuscripts.
MCH professionals play an invaluable role by serving as peer-reviewers for their professional journal. The peer-review process is a fundamental part of maintaining the scientific rigor and professional relevance of our field's literature. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance for the review of manuscripts submitted for publication to professional and scientific journals. In additio...
متن کاملSuggestions for reviewing manuscripts.
BACKGROUND Scientific reviewing is a voluntary process to determine if a manuscript deserves publication. REVIEW MEANS: Responsibly Evaluate, Verify and Improve the manuscript, Educate the authors and editors, and Weigh your expert opinion against the submitted work. Provide your review in a respectful, unbiased and timely manner. REVIEW METHODS Make sure editors know about your willingness t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMC Medical Research Methodology
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01005-y