Utilitarianism without Moral Aggregation

Abstract Is an outcome where many people are saved and one person dies better than the is die? According to standard utilitarian justification, former because it has a greater sum total of well-being. This justification involves controversial form moral aggregation, based on comparison between aggregates different people’s Still, alternative justification—the Argument for Best Outcomes—does not involve aggregation. I extend Outcomes show that any evaluation can be justified without