منابع مشابه
Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology
Social epistemology is a many-splendored subject. Different theorists adopt different approaches and the options are quite diverse, often orthogonal to one another. The approach I favor is to examine social practices in terms of their impact on knowledge acquisition (Goldman 1999). This has at least two virtues: it displays continuity with traditional epistemology, which historically focuses on...
متن کاملGroup knowledge and group rationality: a judgment aggregation perspective
LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in furthe...
متن کاملEmergence of group rationality from irrational individuals
Evolutionary theory predicts that animal decision makers should be rational, meaning that they consistently choose fitnessmaximizing options. Despite this, violations of rationality have been found repeatedly in humans and other animals. The significance of these violations remains controversial, but many explanations point to cognitive limitations that prevent animals from adequately processin...
متن کاملDecision Rules and Group Rationality: Cognitive Gain or Standstill?
Recent research in group cognition points towards the existence of collective cognitive competencies that transcend individual group members' cognitive competencies. Since rationality is a key cognitive competence for group decision making, and group cognition emerges from the coordination of individual cognition during social interactions, this study tests the extent to which collaborative and...
متن کاملFuzzy Rationality as a Basis for Group Decision Making
This paper deals with the group decision making problem, assuming that each individual defines his/her opinion through fuzzy binary preference relations, in parallel to the classical approach due to Prof. Arrow. In particular, it is postulated that the main reason for the discouraging impossibility theorems is neither in the domain of admissible preferences or in the concept of solution (Social...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2330-4014
DOI: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.018