Understanding grooming discourse in computer-mediated environments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Computer-Mediated Discourse
Computer-mediated discourse is the communication produced when human beings interact with one another by transmitting messages via networked computers. The study of computer-mediated discourse (henceforth CMD) is a specialization within the broader interdisciplinary study of computer-mediated communication (CMC), distinguished by its focus on language and language use in computer networked envi...
متن کاملOn Understanding Discourse in Human-Computer Interaction
We report on an experiment that investigated how people naturally communicate with computational devices using speech and gaze. Our approach follows from the idea that human-human conversation involves the establishment of common ground, the use of gaze direction to indicate attention and turn-taking, and awareness of other’s knowledge and abilities. Our goal is to determine whether it is easie...
متن کاملDiscourse About Ideas: Monitoring and Regulation in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Environments
In this paper we analyze the collaborative activity of grade 5-6 students’ as they work on computer-simulated physics problems. We compare two groups; both similarly supported in a basic science-discourse structure, but with that structure embedded in different contexts. The first context is face-to-face, small-group interactions; the second is face-to-face and CSILE (Computer Supported Intenti...
متن کاملCollaborative Discourse Structures in Computer Mediated Group Communications
Using application oriented conceptual maps to categorize the group discussion would be an advancement in the design of CMC systems to allow much larger groups to collaborate productively. The group meta communication process should allow the group to modify and evolve these conceptual discourse templates.
متن کاملUnderstanding metonymies in discourse
We propose a new computational model for the resolution of metonymies, a particular type of figurative language. Typically, metonymies are considered as a violation of semantic constraints (e.g., those expressed by selectional restrictions) that require some repair mechanism (e.g., type coercion) for proper interpretation. We reject this view, arguing that it misses out on the interpretation of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Discourse, Context & Media
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2211-6958
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.004