Two common terminological mistakes in scientific papers
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Writing scientific manuscripts: most common mistakes
I have had the privilege of serving as editor-in-chief for 11 years of two scientific journals: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and the Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. I had the opportunity to read and correct thousands of manuscripts. This experience was greatly enriching, because reading a text professionally completely differs from the perspective of readers in gen...
متن کاملCommon Mistakes in Manuscripts Submitted for Publication.
The MOJ prefers structured abstracts for original papers and unstructured abstracts for case reports. References and illustrations should not be included in the abstract. Introduction The purpose of this section is for authors to briefly introduce the subject including the aim of the study. An introduction without any references is not acceptable as references are essential for readers to verif...
متن کاملTwelve common mistakes in pilonidal sinus care.
Healing of pilonidal sinus wounds (PSWs) by secondary intention requires an average of 2 to 6 months, but delayed healing may require 1 to 2 years or even longer. Characteristically, these midline wounds are in the natal cleft of the buttocks or sacrococcygeal area of the back. These PSWs have costly financial consequences to the healthcare system and negatively affect the quality of life of th...
متن کاملCommon mistakes in computing the nucleolus
Despite linear programming and duality have correctly been incorporated in algorithms to compute the nucleolus, we have found mistakes in how these have been used in a broad range of applications. Overlooking the fact that a linear program can have multiple optimal solutions and neglecting the relevance of duality appear to be crucial sources of mistakes in computing the nucleolus. We discuss t...
متن کاملSix Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting
A vast number of prioritization schemes have been developed to help conservation navigate tough decisions about the allocation of finite resources. However, the application of quantitative approaches to setting priorities in conservation frequently includes mistakes that can undermine their authors' intention to be more rigorous and scientific in the way priorities are established and resources...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1300-0101,1303-6122
DOI: 10.3906/fiz-1506-27