Tobacco Substitutes: Snus and Harm Reduction
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Tobacco Substitutes: Snus and Harm Reduction
Jay Silverman, Michele Decker Masenior and Beyrer’s article is an important contribution to the continuing debate as to the direction of public health efforts regarding commercial sex work [1]. The authors are correct in that the debate between those focused on the social and economic rights of prostituted women and girls as “workers” and those focused on preventing the trafficking of women and...
متن کاملAssessment of Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction: an epidemiological modelling study.
BACKGROUND Swedish snus is a smokeless tobacco product that has been suggested as a tobacco harm reduction product. Our aim was to assess the potential population health effects of snus. METHODS We assessed the potential population health effects of snus in Australia with multistate life tables to estimate the difference in health-adjusted life expectancy between people who have never been sm...
متن کاملShould the Health Community Promote Smokeless Tobacco (Snus) as a Harm Reduction Measure?
BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE The tobacco control community is divided on whether or not to inform the public that using oral, smokeless tobacco (Swedish snus) is less hazardous to health than smoking tobacco. Proponents of "harm reduction" point to the Swedish experience. Snus seems to be widely used as an alternative to cigarettes in Sweden, say these proponents, contributing to the low overall pr...
متن کاملHarm and harm reduction in smokeless tobacco users
Background: This thesis describes the effects of smokeless tobacco (ST) and its derivatives on the oral mucosa; the development of, and results of applying, a cessation program for snuff users with long and extensive exposure; and, the persistent clinical and histomorphological changes after cessation. Methods: Three of the studies were open prospective non-randomized clinical intervention tria...
متن کاملSome Basic Economics of Tobacco Harm Reduction
Tobacco harm reduction (THR) – the substitution of low-risk tobacco/nicotine products for smoking and efforts to encourage such substitution – cannot be understood without understanding the motives and beliefs of consumers and how these affect action. Yet the discussion of THR has largely taken place without consideration of basic welfare economics. This has led to uncertainty about points that...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLoS Medicine
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1549-1676
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040282