THE NASH BARGAINING SOLUTION AS MUTUAL EXPECTED-UTILITY MAXIMIZATION
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Nash Bargaining Solution and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons
Bargaining theory has a conceptual dichotomy at its core: according to one view, the utilities in the bargaining problem are meaningless numbers (v-N.M utilities), while according to another view they do have concrete meaning (willingness to pay). The former position is assumed by the Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions, and the latter is assumed by the egalitarian, utilitarian, and equal-loss...
متن کاملThe Coalitional Nash Bargaining Solution∗
The coalitional Nash bargaining solution is defined to be the core allocation for which the Nash product is maximal. We consider a non-cooperative model in which one team may form. The grand team, consisting of all players, generates the largest surplus. But a smaller team may form. We show that as players get more patient if an efficient and stationary equilibrium exists, it must deliver payof...
متن کاملExpected Qualitative Utility Maximization
A model for decision making that generalizes Expected Utility Maximization is presented. This model, Expected Qualitative Utility Maximization, encompasses the Maximin criterion. It relaxes both the Independence and the Continuity postulates. Its main ingredient is the definition of a qualitative order on nonstandard models of the real numbers and the consideration of nonstandard utilities. Exp...
متن کاملThe Nash Solution to the Bargaining Problem
Policy formation is a process of political interaction among individuals and groups. While some participants in the political process may share similar, or even identical interests, the political preferences of other participants diverge so that conflicts of interest among participating parties are unavoidable. Nevertheless, such conflicts are often resolved in the policy formulation process. T...
متن کاملA characterization of the Nash bargaining solution
We characterize the Nash bargaining solution replacing the axiom of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives with three independent axioms: Independence of Non-Individually Rational Alternatives, Twisting, and Disagreement Point Convexity. We give a non-cooperative bargaining interpretation to this last axiom. JEL Classification, C72, C78. ∗We thank Marco Mariotti, two anonymous referees and an ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan
سال: 1988
ISSN: 0453-4514,2188-8299
DOI: 10.15807/jorsj.31.322