The independence of (in)coherence

Abstract On an increasingly popular view of rationality, rationality is fundamentally about responding correctly to reasons and there no independent rational requirement avoid incoherence: having incoherent combination attitudes irrational not because a fundamental that prohibits it, but rather you are guaranteed fail respond in it. This paper argues any such attempt explain the irrationality incoherence terms responsiveness fails. For something distinctively explained failure reasons. Any adequate account nature coherence requirements on belief intention should take into distinctive kind commitments involved each type attitude.