The Inclusion in WADA Prohibited List Is Not Always Supported by Scientific Evidence: A Narrative Review

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Is the Detection of Odontoma Always Comfortable? A Case Report

Abstract Odontomas are the most common type of odontogenic tumors, which are often discovered by routine radiographic images or after taking films to determine the main cause of the tooth failure eruption or malocclusion. The present study aimed to describe a case of misdiagnosis and similarity of foreign body density in the radiographic appearance to odontoma in a 13-yea...

متن کامل

Pharmacology of stimulants prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

This review examines the pharmacology of stimulants prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Stimulants that increase alertness/reduce fatigue or activate the cardiovascular system can include drugs like ephedrine available in many over-the-counter medicines. Others such as amphetamines, cocaine and hallucinogenic drugs, available on prescription or illegally, can modify mood. A total...

متن کامل

What Enables and Constrains the Inclusion of the Social Determinants of Health Inequities in Government Policy Agendas? A Narrative Review

Background Despite decades of evidence gathering and calls for action, few countries have systematically attenuated health inequities (HI) through action on the social determinants of health (SDH). This is at least partly because doing so presents a significant political and policy challenge. This paper explores this challenge through a review of the empirical literature, asking: what factors h...

متن کامل

The recommendation to not use bronchodilators is not supported by the evidence.

The guideline authors imply that our randomized controlled trial in 703 children with bronchiolitis supports their assertion that “clinical scores may vary from between observers”. This is a selective reading of our Limitations section. The cited article in fact showed an 18% (adjusted relative risk: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.36) relative increase in successful hospital dischar...

متن کامل

Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.

Are meta-analyses the brave new world, or are the critics of such combined analyses right to say that the biases inherent in clinical trials make them uncombinable? Negative trials are often unreported, and hence can be missed by meta-analysts. And how much heterogeneity between trials is acceptable? A recent major criticism is that large randomised trials do not always agree with a prior meta-...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Asian Journal of Sports Medicine

سال: 2021

ISSN: 2008-000X,2008-7209

DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.110753