The excess method: a multiwinner approval voting procedure to allocate wasted votes
نویسندگان
چکیده
In using approval voting to elect multiple winners a committee or council, it is desirable that excess votes—approvals beyond those candidate, especially shoo-in, needs win seat—not be wasted. Common procedures such as sequential proportional (seqPAV) candidates in sequence and depreciate the weights of voters who have gotten one more their approved elected. As consequence, voter “punished” for approving candidate when his her was not necessary To alleviate this problem, we propose modification seqPAV call method. each round, method determines votes winning transfers them other by winner’s supporters. doing so, transforms wasted into support voter’s candidates, later rounds deserve, may benefit from, receiving additional support. parliamentary systems with party lists, equivalent thus ensures approximate representation political parties. When are restricted single list, both methods coincide well-known apportionment due Jefferson/D’Hondt.
منابع مشابه
Is Approval Voting Optimal Given Approval Votes?
Some crowdsourcing platforms ask workers to express their opinions by approving a set of k good alternatives. It seems that the only reasonable way to aggregate these k-approval votes is the approval voting rule, which simply counts the number of times each alternative was approved. We challenge this assertion by proposing a probabilistic framework of noisy voting, and asking whether approval v...
متن کاملOn the Manipulability of Votes: The Case of Approval Voting
The famous result of Gibbard and Satterthwaite shows that every voting procedure is manipulable if the voters can have any preferences over the candidates. That is, a voter may improve the voting result by not voting according to his true preference. Approval voting, introduced by Brams and Fishburn, is not manipulable if preferences are dichotomous: each voter only distinguishes between accept...
متن کاملProperties of multiwinner voting rules
The goal of this paper is to propose and study properties of multiwinner voting rules (with a particular focus on rules based in some way on single-winner scoring rules). We consider, e.g., SNTV, Bloc, k-Borda, STV, and several variants of Chamberlin–Courant’s and Monroe’s rules, identify two natural approaches to defining multiwinner rules, and show that many of our rules can be captured by on...
متن کاملRobustness Among Multiwinner Voting Rules
We investigate how robust are results of committee elections to small changes in the input preference orders, depending on the voting rules used. We find that for typical rules the effect of making a single swap of adjacent candidates in a single preference order is either that (1) at most one committee member can be replaced, or (2) it is possible that the whole committee can be replaced. We a...
متن کاملGroup Fairness in Multiwinner Voting
We study multiwinner voting problems when there is an additional requirement that the selected committee should be fair with respect to attributes such as gender, ethnicity, or political parties. Every setting of an attribute gives rise to a group, and the goal is to ensure that each group is neither over nor under represented in the selected committee. Prior work has largely focused on designi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Choice and Welfare
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0176-1714', '1432-217X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01358-3