Thanking Our Reviewers!

Thanking our peer reviewers

At the beginning of each year, BiO takes the opportunity to thank its many reviewers for their contribution to the journal. The peer review process is the cornerstone of research publication in the biological sciences. As a publishing company, we are very aware that this vital component of the publication process is done, for free, by scientists worldwide. Whilewe can assist our reviewers in ev...

Thanking the reviewers of GMS German Medical Science

Ever since its launch in 2003, GMS German Medical Science benefits from the expertise of numerous reviewers. Their work is of highest value for the quality of the journal; they contribute anonymously, without remuneration and mostly in their spare time to a scientific open access journal. We would like to appreciate their efforts at least ideally at the beginning of the New Year. The editors, a...

Our reviewers

THE QUALITY of a scholarly journal rests upon the knowledge and dedication of its referees. During the past two years, the Associate Editors (Toby Berger, Jack Capon, John G. Proakis, Luther D. Rudolph, Donald L. Snyder, and Terry J. Wagner) and I, all new to our positions, have been deeply impressed by both the competence and the generosity of the referees for this TRANSACTIONS. Their contribu...

Thanks to Our Peer-Reviewers in 2016

Our 2005 Reviewers

T he articles in IEEE Software are the result of many people’s hard work. We deeply appreciate the efforts of everyone who participated in our peer review process from 17 Nov. 2004 to 31 Dec. 2005. Authors often tell us how much they value reviewers’ comments and suggestions. Their expertise, care, and attention help maintain Software’s quality. If you’d like to contribute to our community by r...