منابع مشابه
Non-Monotonic Predicate Logics Syntax, Semantics, Completeness
To simplify our account, rewrite your favorite usual predicate logic, classical, modal, intuitionistic, as a logic of the set L of all statements. This is an inessential change. As Tarski once did, arrange it so that only statements occur in all axioms a and rules of inference I, all of which have the (monotonic) form ”from a, a, ..., infer a. Then a deductively closed set D is merely a subset ...
متن کاملProcessing Of Syntax And Semantics Of Natural Language By Predicate Logic Of Predicate Logic
The syntax and semantic analyses of natural language are described from the standpoint of manmachine communication. The knowledge based system KAUS(Knowledge Acquisition and Utilization System) which has capabilities of deductive inference and automatic program generation of database access is utilized for that purpose. We try to perform syntax and semantic analyses of English sentences more or...
متن کاملA predicate-based approach to defining visual language syntax
This paper presents an approach to the specification of visual language syntax. Based on attributed graphs as the notion of abstract syntax, syntactical correctness is specified by a set of predicates over that structure. The proposed technique facilitates natural embedding of other visual and textual notations, the definition of complex syntactical and static-semantical properties, as well as ...
متن کاملSpeech recognition for east Slavic languages: the case of Russian
In this paper, we present a survey of state-of-the-art systems for automatic processing of recognition of under-resourced languages of the Eastern Europe, in particular, East Slavic languages (Ukrainian, Belarusian and Russian), which share some common prominent features including Cyrillic alphabet, phonetic classes, morphological structure of wordforms and relatively free grammar. A large voca...
متن کاملTranscendental syntax I: deterministic case
We study logic in the light of the Kantian distinction between analytic (untyped, meaningless, locative) answers and synthetic (typed, meaningful, spiritual) questions. Which is specially relevant to proof-theory: in a proof-net, the upper part is locative, whereas the lower part is spititual: a posteriori (explicit) as far as correctness is concerned, a priori (implicit) for questions dealing ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ZAS Papers in Linguistics
سال: 2001
ISSN: 1435-9588
DOI: 10.21248/zaspil.22.2001.99