منابع مشابه
Schwachstellenermittlung und Rückmeldungsprinzipen in einem intelligenten Tutorensystem für juristische Argumentation
Dieser Artikel stellt ein intelligentes Tutorensystem für die Rechtswissenschaften vor. Das System, welches bisher im Rahmen von einigen Pilotstudien getestet wurde, soll Jurastudenten helfen, vor Gericht notwendige Argumentationsstrategien zu lernen. Im verwendeten Ansatz werden Gerichtsprotokolle als Lernmaterialien verwendet: Studenten annotieren diese und erstellen graphische Repräsentation...
متن کاملAssumption-Based Argumentation Translated to Argumentation Frameworks
This benchmark set consists of 426 instances, i.e., argumentation frameworks (AFs) [3] in apx format, obtained from translating instances from assumptionbased argumentation (ABA) [1] to AFs. The ABA benchmark is detailed in [2] and contains 680 ABA frameworks generated via a random generation model with several parameters. In particular, the ABA benchmark set includes cyclic and acyclic ABA fra...
متن کاملArgumentation-Based Negotiation? Negotiation-Based Argumentation!
We design a protocol for two autonomous negotiating agents to incorporate Dung-style argumentation into an ongoing bargaining dialogue. Previous approaches considered bargaining and Dung-Style Argumentation as separated components, we show that intertwining these approaches increases the agents scope of action. In our framework the acceptance of an argument or attack uttered by self-interested ...
متن کاملValue Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks
Hierarchical argumentation frameworks organise Dung argumentation frameworks into a hierarchy so that argumentation over preference information in a level n Dung framework is used to resolve conflicts between arguments in a level n1 framework. In this paper we formalise and extend value based argumentation [1] in a hierarchical argumentation framework and illustrate application of the resulting...
متن کاملRelating Concrete Argumentation Formalisms and Abstract Argumentation
There are a wide variety of formalisms for defeasible reasoning that can be seen as implementing concrete argumentation on defeasible rules. However there has been little work on the relationship between such languages and Dung’s abstract argumentation. In this paper we identify two small fragments on which many concrete defeasible formalisms agree. The two fragments are closely related, as we ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Philosophie
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0081-6825
DOI: 10.24894/stph-de.2007.66011