Some Considerations on Vertical Differencing
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Vertical Differencing for Quasi - Static Models
Vertical differencing is a very different problem from horizontal differencing. This may seem odd, but the explanation is very simple. There are three primary factors. First, gravitational effects are very powerful, and act only in the vertical. Second, the Earth's atmosphere is very shallow compared to its horizontal extent. Third, the atmosphere has a lower boundary. To construct a vertically...
متن کاملSome Considerations on Universality
Without the investigation of the concept of universality it is quite possible that our modern computers wouldn’t exist. Although they are finite automata, at least theoretically, practically they can be treated as Turing machines processing any special program which can be seen as a special Turing machine. This paper presents some general considerations on that concept, presenting in some more ...
متن کاملSome notes on applying computational divided differencing in optimization
We consider the problem of accurate computation of the finite difference f(x+ s)− f(x) when ‖s‖ is very small. Direct evaluation of this difference in floating point arithmetic succumbs to cancellation error and yields 0 when s is sufficiently small. Nonetheless, accurate computation of this finite difference is required by many optimization algorithms for a “sufficient decrease” test. Reps and...
متن کاملSports Law: Some Introductory Considerations
With the rise of importance of sport as a social phenomenon in recent decades, more public attention has been paid to the issue of the legal nature of the rules governing social relations in sports. The issue raised above are only a part of a much broader topic that involves questions of relations of a classical Westphalian state and changes in the international community as well as issues of t...
متن کاملSome Considerations on Conditional Chances
Four interpretations of single-case conditional propensities are described and it is shown that for each a version of what has been called ‘Humphreys’ Paradox’ remains, despite the clarifying work of Gillies, McCurdy and Miller. This entails that propensities cannot be a satisfactory interpretation of standard probability theory.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II
سال: 1978
ISSN: 0026-1165,2186-9057
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.56.2_98