Sociopolitical stress and acute cardiovascular disease hospitalizations around the 2016 presidential election
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Polling and Prediction in the 2016 Presidential Election
Donald Trump was elected president of the United States on 8 November 2016. Within hours, TV pundits were declaring, “Data is dead.” Is this a case of water everywhere but not a drop to drink? It appears so on the surface. More than 250 nationally representative voter-preference surveys were done after the Republicans selected Trump for president and Mike Pence for vice president and the Democr...
متن کاملSome Statistics Concerning the Austrian Presidential Election 2016
The 2016 Austrian presidential runoff election have been repealed by the Austrian constitutional court. The results of the counted votes had yielded a victory of Alexander van der Bellen by a margin of 30.863 votes as compared to the votes for Norbert Hofer. However, the constitutional court found that 77.769 votes were “contaminated” as there have been at least on a formal level violations of ...
متن کاملModeling and forecasting US presidential election using learning algorithms
The primary objective of this research is to obtain an accurate forecasting model for the US presidential election. To identify a reliable model, artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR) models are compared based on some specified performance measures. Moreover, six independent variables such as GDP, unemployment rate, the president’s approval rate, and others are co...
متن کاملU.S. Presidential Election
In elections, political preferences are strongly linked to the expectations of the electoral winner—people usually expect their favorite candidate to win. This link could be driven by wishful thinking (a biasing influence of preferences), driven by a biasing influence of expectations on one’s wishes, or produced spuriously. To examine these competing possibilities in the 2008 U.S. presidential ...
متن کاملTrumping Norms: Lab evidence on aggressive communication before and after the 2016 US presidential election
This paper uses a simple lab experiment designed to test for gender differences in negotiation to show that the 2016 election of Donald Trump had a profound impact on individual behavior in the lab. Huang and Low (2017) use a “Battle of the Sexes” (“BoS”) game with unstructured communication to show that men are less likely to use tough, but effective, negotiation tactics when paired with femal...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0027-8424,1091-6490
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012096117