Simplified decision making in the belief space using belief sparsification

نویسندگان

چکیده

In this work, we introduce a new and efficient solution approach for the problem of decision making under uncertainty, which can be formulated as in belief space, over possibly high-dimensional state space. Typically, to solve problem, one should identify optimal action from set candidates, according some objective. We claim that often generate an analogous yet simplified solved more efficiently. A wise simplification method lead same selection, or maximal loss optimality guaranteed. Furthermore, such is separated inference does not compromise its accuracy, selected would finally applied on original state. First, present concept general problems provide theoretical framework coherent formulation approach. then practically apply these ideas by considering sparse approximation their initial belief. The scalable sparsification algorithm able yield solutions are guaranteed consistent with problem. demonstrate benefits realistic active-SLAM manage significantly reduce computation time, no quality solution. This work both fundamental practical holds numerous possible extensions.

منابع مشابه

Decision-Making with Belief Interval Distance

In this paper we propose a new general method for decisionmaking under uncertainty based on the belief interval distance. We show through several simple illustrative examples how this method works and its ability to provide reasonable results.

متن کامل

Decision Making with Partially Consonant Belief Functions

This paper studies decision making for Wal­ ley's partially consonant belief functions (pcb ) . In a pcb, the set of foci are par­ titioned. Within each partition, foci are nested. The pcb class includes probability and possibility functions as extreme cases. We adopt an axiomatic system, similar in spirit to von Neumann and Morgenstern's ax­ ioms for preferences leading to the linear util­ ity...

متن کامل

Belief Propagation for Structured Decision Making

Variational inference algorithms such as belief propagation have had tremendous impact on our ability to learn and use graphical models, and give many insights for developing or understanding exact and approximate inference. However, variational approaches have not been widely adoped for decision making in graphical models, often formulated through influence diagrams and including both centrali...

متن کامل

Group Decision Making via Probabilistic Belief Merging

We propose a probabilistic-logical framework for group decision-making. Its main characteristic is that we derive group preferences from agents’ beliefs and utilities rather than from their individual preferences as done in social choice approaches. This can be more appropriate when the individual preferences hide too much of the individuals’ opinions that determined their preferences. We intro...

متن کامل

Extended TOPSISs for Belief Group Decision Making

Multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA) problems in the situation of belief group decision making (BGDM) are a special class of decision problems, where the attribute evaluations of each decision maker (DM) are represented by belief functions. In order to solve these special problems, in this paper, TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) model is extended by...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The International Journal of Robotics Research

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1741-3176', '0278-3649']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649221076381