Self-Stigma and Consumer Participation in Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Services
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Assessing Patient Participation in Health Policy Decision-Making in Cyprus
Although the importance of patient participation in the design and evaluation of health programs and services is well-documented, there is scarcity of research with regard to patient association (PA) participation in health policy decision-making processes. To this end, the present study aimed to validate further a previously developed instrument as well as to investigate the degree of PA parti...
متن کاملConsumer and relationship factors associated with shared decision making in mental health consultations.
OBJECTIVE This study explored the association between shared decision making and consumers' illness management skills and consumer-provider relationships. METHODS Medication management appointments for 79 consumers were audio recorded. Independent coders rated overall shared decision making, minimum level of shared decision making, and consumer-provider agreement for 63 clients whose visit in...
متن کاملShared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine
This paper describes the shared decision-making model, reviews its current status in the mental health field, and discusses its potential impact on personalized medicine. Shared decision making denotes a structured process that encourages full participation by patient and provider. Current research shows that shared decision making can improve the participation of mental health patients and the...
متن کاملImplementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.
Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health care involves clinicians and patients working together to make decisions. The key elements of SDM have been identified, decision support tools have been developed, and SDM has been recommended in mental health at policy level. Yet implementation remains limited. Two justifications are typically advanced in support of SDM. The clinical justification ...
متن کاملShared Mental Models & Decision-Making
The Problem: Decision-making among members of a group entails aggregating the opinions of the constituents. If the opinions are unconstrained, then concensus typically fails when any vote is taken. In contrast, when opinions reflect a shared model of the domain, then concensus is likely, assuming members can communicate accurately the reasons for their individual choices. How, then, will concen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychiatric Services
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1075-2730,1557-9700
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600282