Self-Formalisation of Higher-Order Logic

Self-Formalisation of Higher-Order Logic Semantics, Soundness, and a Verified Implementation

We present a mechanised semantics for higher-order logic (HOL), and a proof of soundness for the inference system, including the rules for making definitions, implemented by the kernel of the HOL Light theorem prover. Our work extends Harrison’s verification of the inference system without definitions. Soundness of the logic extends to soundness of a theorem prover, because we also show that a ...

First-Order Logic Formalisation of Arrow's Theorem

Arrow’s Theorem is a central result in social choice theory. It states that, under certain natural conditions, it is impossible to aggregate the preferences of a finite set of individuals into a social preference ordering. We formalise this result in the language of first-order logic, thereby reducing Arrow’s Theorem to a statement saying that a given set of first-order formulas does not posses...

Executing Higher Order Logic

We report on the design of a prototyping component for the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. Specifications consisting of datatypes, recursive functions and inductive definitions are compiled into a functional program. Functions and inductively defined relations can be mixed. Inductive definitions must be such that they can be executed in Prolog style but requiring only matching rather than unificat...

Higher-Order Logic Programming

Higher-Order Computational Logic

This paper presents the case for the use of higher-order logic as a foundation for computational logic. A suitable polymorphicallytyped, higher-order logic is introduced and its syntax and proof theory briefly described. In addition, a metric space of closed terms suitable for knowledge representation purposes is presented. The approach to representing individuals is illustrated with some examp...