Rotary and subsoiling tillage rotations influence soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration and crop yield

نویسندگان

چکیده

Long-term single tillage causes serious deterioration of land quality and reduction crop yield. Tillage rotation can alleviate the problems caused by long-term tillage. However, effects different rotations are still very limited. A experiment was conducted in North China Plain to evaluate impacts on soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (STN) There were eight treatments with two main factors: practice (four types: rotary (R, 2002-2017), subsoiling (S, (RS, 2015-2017) (SR, 2015-2017)) straw management (two return (F) removal (0)). RSF treatment yielded highest SOC, at 12.53 g/kg. significantly increased SOC 41.4% compared RF, while SRF reduced 11.1% SF. In addition, STN content 21.7% that under RF. Compared SF, promoted uniform distribution 0-20 cm layer. Among treatments, stock (SOCS) (STNS), which 67.68 t/ha 6.63 t/ha, respectively. RF treatment, greatly SOCS, 31.7%. Both STNS 13.3% 2.3% 2016, annual yield 19.80 t/ha. 2017, SF 21.37 next 20.94 summary, followed combined (RSF) increase The is an effective measure for improving increasing yields Plain.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Tillage, Nitrogen, and Cropping System Effects on Soil Carbon Sequestration

With increased cropping intensity, one would expect that more crop residue and C would be added to the Soil C sequestration can improve soil quality and reduce agriculsoil than with a crop-fallow system (Campbell et al., ture’s contribution to CO2 emissions. The long-term (12 yr) effects of tillage system and N fertilization on crop residue production and 1995, 2000b; Janzen et al., 1998a; Pete...

متن کامل

Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotations.

Soil C change and CO2 emission due to different tillage systems need to be evaluated to encourage the adoption of conservation practices to sustain soil productivity and protect the environment. We hypothesize that soil C storage and CO2 emission respond to conservation tillage differently from conventional tillage because of their differential effects on soil properties. This study was conduct...

متن کامل

Impact of Tillage and Crop Rotation Systems on Soil Carbon Sequestration

What is carbon (C) sequestration? Carbon sequestration can be defi ned as the capture and secure storage of carbon that would otherwise be emitted to or remain in the atmosphere. The idea is to (1) prevent carbon emissions produced by human activities from reaching the atmosphere by capturing and diverting them to secure storage, or (2) remove carbon from the atmosphere by various means and sto...

متن کامل

Tillage, cropping systems, and nitrogen fertilizer source effects on soil carbon sequestration and fractions.

Quantification of soil carbon (C) cycling as influenced by management practices is needed for C sequestration and soil quality improvement. We evaluated the 10-yr effects of tillage, cropping system, and N source on crop residue and soil C fractions at 0- to 20-cm depth in Decatur silt loam (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Paleudults) in northern Alabama, USA. Treatments were incomplete fact...

متن کامل

Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Dryland Soil and Residue Carbon and Nitrogen

Sustainable management practices are needed to enhance soil productivity in degraded dryland soils in the northern Great Plains. We examined the effects of two tillage practices [conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT)], five crop rotations [continuous spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (CW), spring wheat-fallow (W-F), spring wheat-lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) (W-L), spring wheat-spring whea...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Plant Soil and Environment

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1805-9368', '1214-1178']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/396/2021-pse