Roadblocks to Disarmament in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty System
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract For the last five decades, states parties to Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) have come together every 5 years at Review Conferences explore how they can advance Treaty’s goals, including pursuit of nuclear disarmament. Despite lengthy negotiations, failed reach a consensus final document as many times succeeded and even when has been agreed it contained few tangible gains for those working towards weapon free world. This state affairs played out again in 2022 NPT’s 10th Conference ended without agreement with decrying weakness disarmament provisions that had under discussion. It common aftermath academics consider contemporary political issues stymied progress. While such studies are important, is also necessary what deeper structural may be play preventing goal from being advanced NPT context. To this end, article identifies analyses three key create difficulties pursuing agenda. First, explores scope content Article VI interpreted by states. Secondly, looks arise commitment achieving outcomes and, thirdly, considers limitations who actually attends contributes Conferences.
منابع مشابه
DEBATING DISARMAMENT Interpreting Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
The author offers a close analysis of Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the treaty’s only article dealing with disarmament, focusing upon both its text and negotiating history, and assesses its applicability as a standard for judging treaty compliance. The author critiques comments on Article VI made by the International Court of Justice in a 1996 case ...
متن کاملThe Non-Aligned Movement and Nuclear Disarmament: Stance and Actions
The emergence of nuclear weapons as a new actor in international relations has introduced a new area in the international security arena. Since the appearance of these weapons, there have been increasing efforts to limit and destroy them in order to achieve global peace in the framework of disarmament and centered around the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Along with the eme...
متن کاملA Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Although nuclear non-proliferation is an almost universal human desire, in practice, the negotiated treaties appear unable to prevent the steady growth of the number of states that have nuclear weapons. We propose a computational model for understanding the complex issues behind nuclear arms negotiations, the motivations of various states to enter a nuclear weapons program and the ways to diffu...
متن کاملDisarmament, Non-Proliferation, and the Rule of Law
Disarmament has had its ups and downs, to say the least. If Dr. Johnson were with us tonight, he might quip that its persistence marks a triumph of hope over experience. Progress in this field is often slow and incremental. Sometimes it is ambiguous or subject to conflicting interpretations. Sometimes it is hard to assign credit to individuals or specific policies when progress is made, or to a...
متن کاملVerifying Nuclear Disarmament
Commentators differ on whether nuclear disarmament would be desirable, but many argue that disarmament is impractical because it could not be verified. Three reasons are often offered for such pessimism. First, nuclear weapons are small and difficult to detect, and one could not be sure that a few weapons had not been hidden away. Second, nuclear weapons are so destructive that a mere handful w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Conflict and Security Law
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1467-7954', '1467-7962']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krad011