Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote
An important task in conducting a systematic review is reading titles and abstracts of the retrieved references, which often number in the thousands, to determine which articles meet the predefined inclusion criteria. In the past, this was performed by manually scanning through large stacks of printed titles and abstracts, followed by face-to-face meetings to discuss which references should be ...
متن کاملUpdating search strategies for systematic reviews using EndNote
Performing, writing, and publishing a systematic review take a long time. In a cohort of journalpublished systematic reviews, Cochrane reviews, and health technology assessment reports, the median time lag between the stated last search date and publication was 61 weeks (interquartile range, 33–87 weeks) [1]. In the same cohort of reviews, 7% were out of date at the time of publication [2]. Mor...
متن کاملEndNote: Using Technology to Keep Track of References
EndNote is a program for managing bibliographic references that allows the user: • to create a database of references (and extended abstracts) that can be queried in many ways • to copy references directly into their favorite word processing program and to create a bibliography at the end of the paper • to format a paper that includes in-text citations and a bibliography to meet the standards o...
متن کاملPitfalls of reviewing reviews.
I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews should be subject to the widest readership and most rigorous critique if they are to properly influence future practice. Reviews that are solely conducted by small groups in academia can miss out on the wider stakeholder engagement journals’ offer that encourages debate and fosters learning. A feature of t...
متن کاملWorldwide inequality in production of systematic reviews
Background: Investment in science is vital for the development and well-being of societies. This study aims to assess the scientific productivity of countries by quantifying their publication of systematic reviews taking the gross national income per capita (GNIPC) into account. Methods: Medline and ISI Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews published between 1st January 2006 an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Medical Library Association
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1558-9439,1536-5050
DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.111