reviewing Onda Latina

Emergência da quinta onda de inovação bancária

Health Disparity among Latina Women: Comparison with Non-Latina Women

Analyzing the Latino community and focusing on the women that make up this fast-growing demographic create a better understanding of the needs and considerations for health-care professionals and social policies. It is important that national health and health-care data on the Latino ethnic group be presented by gender in order to determine areas specific to women. This review focuses on the ex...

Suggestions for Reviewing Texts

 مقدمه: یکی از مهمترین مراحل در فرآیند تحقیق، هدایت بررسی متون بصورتی مناسب می باشد. این فرآیند از نظر بیشتر دانشجویان و محققین وظیفه ای سنگین و خطیر است(۱). امروزه با توجه به رشد و توسعه فن آوری اطلاعات، محققین با انفجار اطلاعات مواجه هستند، به نحوی که تقریبا در یک روز ۶۰۰۰ متن علمی جدید منتشر می شود و آگاهیهای علمی تقریبا پس از گذشت هر ۵ سال دو برابر می گردد.

Reviewing a reviewer.

We are all authors, but at the same time we are all reviewers. We write articles, anticipate that they will be reviewed quickly and favorably and hope that they will be accepted. We write reviews and anticipate that our recommendations will be honored and our concerns will be addressed. The work of authors is visible and rewarding (if published), the work of reviewers is anonymous and not that ...

Pitfalls of reviewing reviews.

I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews should be subject to the widest readership and most rigorous critique if they are to properly influence future practice. Reviews that are solely conducted by small groups in academia can miss out on the wider stakeholder engagement journals’ offer that encourages debate and fosters learning. A feature of t...