Reviewing Manuscripts forAustralian Social Work

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts.

BACKGROUND Scientific reviewing is a voluntary process to determine if a manuscript deserves publication. REVIEW MEANS: Responsibly Evaluate, Verify and Improve the manuscript, Educate the authors and editors, and Weigh your expert opinion against the submitted work. Provide your review in a respectful, unbiased and timely manner. REVIEW METHODS Make sure editors know about your willingness t...

متن کامل

A guide to reviewing manuscripts.

MCH professionals play an invaluable role by serving as peer-reviewers for their professional journal. The peer-review process is a fundamental part of maintaining the scientific rigor and professional relevance of our field's literature. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance for the review of manuscripts submitted for publication to professional and scientific journals. In additio...

متن کامل

Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

The quality of journals rests, to a large degree, on the quality of the peer review process. Like nearly all scientific journals, the ARCHIVES relies on a volunteer pool of talented individualswhotake timeoutof their busyweektoreviewmanuscripts.The journalcouldnotbepublishedwithouttheirhelp, and we are extremely grateful for their efforts. However, reviewers are rarely given anyadvice,bytheirse...

متن کامل

A beginner’s guide to reviewing manuscripts in ecology and conservation

Peer review is a hallmark of scientific publishing, yet finding peers to conduct reviews is increasingly challenging. Some attribute this challenge to the “tragedy of the referee commons,” wherein selfish behaviors related to the publication of scientific manuscripts lead to unsustainable use of potential referees and a reduction in the quality of scientific publications. To address the tragedy...

متن کامل

Reviewing Scientific Manuscripts: A Comprehensive Guide for Peer Reviewers.

86 The abstract provides the authors with an opportunity to summarize the objectives, methods, 87 results and conclusions for the journal readers. It is oftentimes the first, and perhaps only, section 88 of the manuscript that will be read as it is typically freely available through reference databases. 89 The abstract should provide a clear statement of the study objectives, which must match w...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Australian Social Work

سال: 2015

ISSN: 0312-407X,1447-0748

DOI: 10.1080/0312407x.2015.1010554