Response to Hartwig and Davies

Response to Hartwig and Davies

and indeed many of the other analyses reported in our paper do not suffer from potential bias due to weak instruments. Hartwig and Davies did, however, suggest that we could have used estimates from an external source to obtain less biased results in our MR-Egger analyses. Whereas we agree that this would be good practice in most situations, we do not feel that it would have been appropriate in...

Authors’ response to Hartwig and Davies

1. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1–22. 2. Burgess S, Timpson NJ, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: where are we now and where are we going? Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:379–88. 3. Haycock PC, Burgess S, Wade KH, Bowden J, Relton C, Davey Smith G....

Hartwig symbols

pulp cap and pulp response

چکیده ندارد.

response articles: micro and macro analysis

the present study reports an analysis of response articles in four different disciplines in the social sciences, i.e., linguistics, english for specific purposes (esp), accounting, and psychology. the study has three phases: micro analysis, macro analysis, and e-mail interview. the results of the micro analysis indicate that a three-level linguistic pattern is used by the writers in order to cr...