Resilience to Terminal Drought, Heat, and Their Combination Stress in Wheat Genotypes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Heat and drought stresses have negative impacts on wheat yield growth worldwide, causing up to 60% 40% losses, respectively, but their combined effect can cause severe losses. The present study aimed identify the high-yielding genetic resources tolerant and/or heat under climate change scenarios. field trials 42 genotypes were conducted at three locations in four environments (normal TSIR-NS, TSRF-DR, LSIR-HT, LSRF-DHT) each for two consecutive years. Yield contributing traits recorded all experiments locations: SI (susceptibility index) STI (stress tolerance also estimated. GY (Grain yield) was severely affected by LSRF-DHT (48.6%), followed TSRF-DR (23.6%) LSIR-HT (16.8%). had a positive correlation with BM (biomass), HI (harvest index), TGW (1000-grain weight) DH (days heading) (LSIR-HT LSRF-DHT). Stepwise regression analysis revealed higher contribution of towards environments. GW (grain weight/spike) contributed LSRF-DHT, GN number/spike) TSIR-NS TSRF-DR. GFD (grain-filling duration), TGW, PTL (productive tillers) conditions except LSRF-DHT. WS 2016-4 only genotype that yielded high conditions. 2016-12 CNM 16-1 yielding. HINDI 62, HTW 11, QBP 1606 less sensitive low Overall, out 30 (10 category), 19 adapted escape mechanism which is irrespective yielding level. demonstrated potential identified breeding resilience imparting these genotypes.
منابع مشابه
Molecular responses to drought and heat stress in durum wheat
Water scarcity and high temperature stress and their combination are the most important stresses experienced by durum wheat in the ield. The responses induced by drought and heat stress at transcriptional level have been described, but much less is known about plant response to simultaneous drought and heat stress, although this is the most common event in ield conditions. Several data indicate...
متن کاملEvaluation of Leaf Proteome in Wheat Genotypes Under Drought Stress
Drought stress in plants, the change (increase or decrease) in the production of plant proteins. Proteomics in recent years one of the most powerful tools that help us to study the changes in protein In order to investigate the proteome of wheat leaves in response to terminal drought, two genotypes susceptible and resistant wheat genotypes were evaluated under irrigated (non-stress) and rain-fe...
متن کاملEvaluation of Leaf Proteome in Wheat Genotypes Under Drought Stress
Drought stress in plants, the change (increase or decrease) in the production of plant proteins. Proteomics in recent years one of the most powerful tools that help us to study the changes in protein In order to investigate the proteome of wheat leaves in response to terminal drought, two genotypes susceptible and resistant wheat genotypes were evaluated under irrigated (non-stress) and rain-fe...
متن کاملThe impact of terminal heat stress on yield and heat tolerance of bread wheat
In arid and semi-arid regions of the world bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield is highlylimited due to late season heat stress, mostly occurring during the reproductive phase. Hence thecurrent study was conducted to evaluate the effect of late season heat stress on grain yield andyield components of 20 spring bread wheat cultivars. For this purpose, a stripe block experimentincluding four ...
متن کاملGenetic diversity in spring wheat cultivars and relationships between traits under terminal drought stress
For evaluation of the traits related to water deficit stress in 20 spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and subsequently determination of the most tolerant and sensitive cultivars, an experiment was carried out in split plot based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) in the research farm of the University of Tabriz, Iran during 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 crop seasons. The first fac...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Agronomy
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2156-3276', '0065-4663']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030891