Reporting quality of systematic reviews with moxibustion
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture
BACKGROUND The QUOROM and PRISMA statements were published in 1999 and 2009, respectively, to improve the consistency of reporting systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of clinical trials. However, not all SRs/MAs adhere completely to these important standards. In particular, it is not clear how well SRs/MAs of acupuncture studies adhere to reporting standards and which reporting criteri...
متن کاملDoes updating improve the quality of reporting of systematic reviews?
1 Community Information and Epidemiological Technologies (CIET), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam the Netherlands. 2 Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3 Professor and Director, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Depar...
متن کاملA PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of published dental systematic reviews in Iran, up to 2017
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proper scientific reporting is necessary to ensure correct interpretation of study results by readers. Systematic reviews (SRs) are of critical importance in evidence-based dentistry. This study assessed the reporting quality of published dental SRs in Iran.METHODS: The PubMed and ISI electronic databases were searched to collect published Iranian dental SRs up to the end of...
متن کاملQuality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review
OBJECTIVES To examine the quality of reporting of harms in systematic reviews, and to determine the need for a reporting guideline specific for reviews of harms. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). REVIEW METHODS Databases were searched for systematic reviews having an adverse event a...
متن کاملEpidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews (SRs) have become increasingly popular to a wide range of stakeholders. We set out to capture a representative cross-sectional sample of published SRs and examine them in terms of a broad range of epidemiological, descriptive, and reporting characteristics, including emerging aspects not previously examined. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched Medline for SRs indexe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Chinese Medicine
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1749-8546
DOI: 10.1186/s13020-020-00385-z