منابع مشابه
Everettian Confirmation and Sleeping Beauty: Reply to Wilson
In Bradley ([2011b]), I offered an analysis of Sleeping Beauty and the Everettian interpretation of quantum mechanics (EQM). I argued that one can avoid a kind of easy confirmation of EQM by paying attention to observation selection effects, that halfers are right about Sleeping Beauty, and that thirders cannot avoid easy confirmation for the truth of EQM. Wilson ([forthcoming]) agrees with my ...
متن کاملIntensions and Indeterminacy: Reply to Soames, Turner, and Wilson
I am grateful to Scott Soames, Jason Turner, and Mark Wilson for their comments on Constructing the World. Soames andWilson are two of the primary opponents I had in mind in writing the book, and it is useful to see just where our disagreements lie. Both of them raise central issues about the semantic applications of the epistemological framework in the book, especially the use of the scrutabil...
متن کاملHow intent to interact can affect action scaling of distance: reply to Wilson
Soliman et al. (2013) set out to demonstrate how the bodily level of analysis can unify explanations in psychology. Our argument was that common sensorimotor mechanisms underlie many of the behavioral phenomena that are currently segregated as cognitive, social, or cultural. Toward that end, we re-characterized a cultural construct—self-construal along the dimension of independence and interdep...
متن کاملEvaluating support for the resource-ratio hypothesis: a reply to Wilson et al.
1. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306; 2. Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755; 3. Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento, California 95819; 4. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida 33149; 5. Unité Mixte de Recherche 55...
متن کاملWhen similarities matter more than differences: a reply to Wilson et al
In our recent Discussion paper, we presented our view that the only real distinction between biological invasions and natural colonisations is the human element. We agree that invasion science is a very important science, not only to better understand the role that human mediation plays for colonisation, but also for many other science fields. We agree with all invasion researchers that the hum...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Anthropologist
سال: 1958
ISSN: 0002-7294,1548-1433
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1958.60.6.02a00190