Rank Aggregation Using Scoring Rules

نویسندگان

چکیده

To aggregate rankings into a social ranking, one can use scoring systems such as Plurality, Veto, and Borda. We distinguish three types of methods: ranking by score, repeatedly choosing winner that we delete rank at the top, loser bottom. The latter method captures frequently studied voting rules Single Transferable Vote (aka Instant Runoff Voting), Coombs, Baldwin. In an experimental analysis, show methods produce different in practice. also provide evidence sequentially selecting winners is most suitable to detect "true" candidates. For our classes, then study (parameterized) computational complexity deciding which positions given candidate appear chosen ranking. As part consider Winner Determination problem for STV, Baldwin determine their when there are few voters or

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Optimizing Positional Scoring Rules for Rank Aggregation

Nowadays, several crowdsourcing projects exploit social choice methods for computing an aggregate ranking of alternatives given individual rankings provided by workers. Motivated by such systems, we consider a setting where each worker is asked to rank a fixed (small) number of alternatives and, then, a positional scoring rule is used to compute the aggregate ranking. Among the apparently infin...

متن کامل

Scoring rules for judgment aggregation

This paper introduces a new class of judgment aggregation rules, to be called ‘scoring rules’ after their famous counterparts in preference aggregation theory. A scoring rule generates the collective judgment set which reaches the highest total ‘score’across the individuals, subject to the judgment set having to be rational. Depending on how we de…ne ‘scores’, we obtain several (old and new) so...

متن کامل

Acceptance, Aggregation and Scoring Rules

This article provides a novel perspective on the vexed issue of the relation between probability and rational acceptability, exploiting a recently-noted structural parallel with the problem of judgment aggregation. After offering a number of general desiderata on the relation between finite probability models and sets of accepted sentences in a Boolean sentential language, it is noted that a nu...

متن کامل

Voting with Rank Dependent Scoring Rules

Positional scoring rules in voting compute the score of an alternative by summing the scores for the alternative induced by every vote. This summation principle ensures that all votes contribute equally to the score of an alternative. We relax this assumption and, instead, aggregate scores by taking into account the rank of a score in the ordered list of scores obtained from the votes. This def...

متن کامل

Rank Aggregation for Filter Feature Selection in Credit Scoring

The credit industry is a fast growing field, credit institutions collect data about credit customer and use them to build credit model. The collected information may be full of unwanted and redundant features which may speed down the learning process, so, effective feature selection methods are needed for credit dataset. In general, Filter feature selection methods outperform other feature sele...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2159-5399', '2374-3468']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25685